Live data from Hacker News

First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

blog.ibd.com

21–30 of 69 posts

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#21
post #6

[deleted]

Most Americans are not aware of their freedoms having been eroded in any meaningful way. Certainly not, to the degree that the linked to poem suggests, that they might eventually be rounded up by a government death squad because looking at Boing Boing pushed their XKeyScore rating past the red line.

Americans tend to see things through party politics and identity anyway - and as such, you'll see a much bigger uproar over things like Obamacare and gun legislation after Newtown than you likely ever will over this, because this is such a new phenomenon that the party controllers are only now coming up with ways to either take credit or lay blame. Most Americans don't care about this, at worse it's a drama that plays out now and then on the news, and a minor inconvenience when they fly. It's a nonevent.

And there have been protests, and hearings, and what have you - but if what you're expecting is violence in the streets, if you're expecting a revolution like Syria - that's not going to happen.

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is garden variety cognitive dissonance. Which isn't limited to Americans.

On this specific issue it's pretty limited to America, not much other countries can do to fix the NSA issue

You don't actually think the U.S. is the only country spying on its citizens or the world right?

The only reason it's even a huge deal is because of the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In countries without a similar constitutional guarantee your spy agencies probably aren't even breaking the law. They're probably watching everything you do with total impunity.

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#23
post #18
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As an American, I don't think there's a way to stop this through the democratic process: If a whistle blower publishes details showing the government is running "Project X", and we "kick the bastards out" that authorized it via the ballot process, and the government shuts down "Project X" as a result, all the NSA needs to do is rename it "Project Y". I'm seriously at a loss as to what to do about this problem.

You get good people in at the top that actually reform things and change the organizational culture. It's very fixable. We've already come a very long way. The FBI used to blackmail politicians. The CIA used to frequently replace foreign leaders and even pulled that trick on us one time. Now we have a much more subtle form of unconstitutional behavior. Like Bush before him, Obama thinks it's his "#1 job is to protect…

> You get good people in at the top that actually reform things and change the organizational culture. It's very fixable.

"Trust us, everything is fixed now. No, we can't go into detail for national security reasons."

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#25
post #21
post #6

[deleted]

Most Americans are not aware of their freedoms having been eroded in any meaningful way. Certainly not, to the degree that the linked to poem suggests, that they might eventually be rounded up by a government death squad because looking at Boing Boing pushed their XKeyScore rating past the red line. Americans tend to see things through party politics and identity anyway - and as such, you'll see a much bigger uproar…

>but if what you're expecting is violence in the streets, if you're expecting a revolution like Syria - that's not going to happen.

No, absolutely not, violence would only set this issue back (imagine if the NSA now had a "valid" reason to target people, for inciting violence).

>Most Americans are not aware of their freedoms having been eroded in any meaningful way.

People need to see that their freedoms have been eroded which is one of the major issues, which is why their needs to be peaceful assembly and people making noise so that the average American fully understands the extent of the NSA's breach of privacy and civil liberties.

> that they will be rounded up by a government death squad because looking at Boing Boing pushed their XKeyScore rating past the red line.

Sure people aren't being rounded up by a government death squad, but tracking peoples every movements via phone and every single detail on their online personas is an incredible breach of privacy and civil liberties. It's only a matter of time until it escalates and you have to remove a weed before it takes hold in your garden, while it's still small enough to manage.

>Most Americans don't care about this

Then it needs to become an issue that Americans care about by the people who do understand how terrible the actions of the NSA are (in this case, most HN readers)

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#26
post #6

[deleted]

Because our schools SUCK. Not 100% of them, but 95+% of them.

The schools do not teach independent, rational thinking, nor do they do a decent job teaching American history or historical American political values.

In fact, they are much more likely to attack them. For example, by claiming that the Founding Fathers were slaveholding bigots, or that early settlers were genocidal. Both of which are oft-repeated claims that are much more false than true.

If we wanted to avoid all this, we would have needed to have separation of School and State, in the same way and for the same reasons we [are supposed to] have separation of Church and State.

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#27
I think most people feel powerless, either financially or technically.

Many people I know think what the NSA is doing is completely wrong, but they have problems logging into facebook and getting their email to work, they just feel powerless because they don't understand the technology behind the world they live in.

How can they stand up to something they can't even begin to comprehend?

The NSA could literally do anything they wanted to most people and they wouldn't even know about it.

And then we have a much smaller group of people in the tech industry (most people who frequent Hacker News), who know what the NSA is doing is horribly horribly wrong, but are afraid of being destroyed financially, socially, and professionally for standing up to them.

It feels like swimming up a waterfall. The NSA can so easily ruin lives by planting illegal material on your computer, then tip off the local cops who get a search warrant, then they seize your computer and find the illegal material on your computer.

And you life is ruined.

I mean, they are so powerful technologically speaking, they can ruin lives without so much as lifting a finger.

It's very scary and very real.

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#28
post #6

[deleted]

It's because of the American separatist mentality. Your average gun toting, freedom loving American sees the world through a very polarizing lens. Not long ago, I read the book American Sniper by Chris Kyle [1], about a Navy SEAL who is the most successful American sniper of all times. The good guy/bad guy dichotomy is very apparent throughout the book. He claims his life's priorities are "God, Country, Family", in that particular order. Reading this can be a bit uncomfortable to a liberal minded individual. And when Chris Kyle fought and killed all those insurgents, I have no doubt he was doing it in the name of freedom; but the freedom he was seeking was freedom from Muslims.

A person like this - and his viewpoint is not alien or even radical in America - sees the USA as a nearly sole force of good, the home of the free and enlightened. Logically, someone like that would not wish to place limits on the military capabilities of the USA, as he still sees the world in a confrontational light.

Put simply, a large part of the American public sees the world in a confrontational way and doesn't wish to reign the military capability of their government.

Under the ideas of capitalism, gun rights and the constitution, such Americans feel they are serving an enlightened, balanced mechanism, and they want it to go on.

TL;DR Americans want freedom from you; they take the freedom from their government for granted.

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Kyle

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#29
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On this specific issue it's pretty limited to America, not much other countries can do to fix the NSA issue

You don't actually think the U.S. is the only country spying on its citizens or the world right? The only reason it's even a huge deal is because of the 4th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In countries without a similar constitutional guarantee your spy agencies probably aren't even breaking the law. They're probably watching everything you do with total impunity.

I'm aware that it's not the only country, all countries have some form of intelligence agency, that's really besides the point honestly, the US has by far the largest, most automated system with frightening capabilities that is targetting everyone around the world.

>They're probably watching everything you do with total impunity.

I'd rather ere on the side of rationality here and without any evidence to the contrary I'm going to doubt any systems exist that are as large and thorough as the NSA's in my own country.

Re: First they came for the Whistleblowers, and I did not speak out

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> They celebrated 4th of July yesterday, celebrated their freedom and liberty as their government takes away those core values. For most Americans it's a day of barbecues, fireworks, and beer without much (if any) thought or celebration of freedom and liberty.

Really? I can't click on any link on the web about Independence Day without being bombarded with messages about freedom and liberty which leads me to believe that it is in the minds of US citizens when this day comes about

The media expresses it so that we individuals don't have to.
Post reply on HN