http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/us/22iht-currents.html
(SO this is about the word “so.”)
21–30 of 162 posts
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/22/us/22iht-currents.html
(SO this is about the word “so.”)
I was never taught about the Oxford Comma (I'm not a native speaker), but trained myself to use it consistently after seeing this http://jaced.com/blogpix/2013/washingtonlincolnoxford.jpg . This has made me rethink though - he makes a great point that writing is about transferring the voices in my head into the readers', so I'll keep that in mind for any creative writing. Heck, not just creative writing, I can think…
To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God [1]
Is the writer's mother Ayn Rand?[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_comma#Creating_ambiguity
Had to read this several times because the horrible punctuation made the sentence unreadable without thinking.
Stopped reading after footnote 2.
I was never taught about the Oxford Comma (I'm not a native speaker), but trained myself to use it consistently after seeing this http://jaced.com/blogpix/2013/washingtonlincolnoxford.jpg . This has made me rethink though - he makes a great point that writing is about transferring the voices in my head into the readers', so I'll keep that in mind for any creative writing. Heck, not just creative writing, I can think…
Consider though: To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God [1] Is the writer's mother Ayn Rand? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_comma#Creating_ambiguity
To my mother Ayn Rand, and to God
Not the same wording, but that's how I would write it, given the freedom.I hardly know my grammar rules and I don't care. But I do care about making sure that writing is clear.
That's the basic rule I've applied to the hundreds of books that I've edited. Oxford comma. Huh?
I was never taught about the Oxford Comma (I'm not a native speaker), but trained myself to use it consistently after seeing this http://jaced.com/blogpix/2013/washingtonlincolnoxford.jpg . This has made me rethink though - he makes a great point that writing is about transferring the voices in my head into the readers', so I'll keep that in mind for any creative writing. Heck, not just creative writing, I can think…
I was never taught about the Oxford Comma (I'm not a native speaker), but trained myself to use it consistently after seeing this http://jaced.com/blogpix/2013/washingtonlincolnoxford.jpg . This has made me rethink though - he makes a great point that writing is about transferring the voices in my head into the readers', so I'll keep that in mind for any creative writing. Heck, not just creative writing, I can think…
Consider though: To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God [1] Is the writer's mother Ayn Rand? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_comma#Creating_ambiguity
To my mother, Ayn Rand, and to God
and otherwise assume not (or completely distribute the "to" for no ambiguity).EDIT: My sibling post has another good alternative.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider though: To my mother, Ayn Rand, and God [1] Is the writer's mother Ayn Rand? [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_comma#Creating_ambiguity
To my mother Ayn Rand, and to God Not the same wording, but that's how I would write it, given the freedom.