Live data from Hacker News

Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

bbc.co.uk

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#21

Oh, you mean scrobbling? That thing last.fm has done forever? And it only activates when you go into the status update UI? Sad that there's not a single, not even one positive mention of this feature here. I'm starting to think this whole privacy thing has turned a lot of you into luddites. I'm serious. The highest rated fucking comment is a post that takes a line from 1984 and replaces "telescreen" with "iphone". Ye…

The tech is awesome. I just don't trust Facebook, that's all. And it's not the same as scrobbling because it will match TV shows or music that other people around you are playing.

Also, I don't "scrobble" because I was never comfortable sharing that data.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#22

Oh, you mean scrobbling? That thing last.fm has done forever? And it only activates when you go into the status update UI? Sad that there's not a single, not even one positive mention of this feature here. I'm starting to think this whole privacy thing has turned a lot of you into luddites. I'm serious. The highest rated fucking comment is a post that takes a line from 1984 and replaces "telescreen" with "iphone". Ye…

I agree. I'm not a Facebook user, so I probably won't run into this feature myself, but it sounds really impressive to me.

If I read it right, it can detect the TV show down to episode? I'm guessing it functions just like Shazam style music detection, but I still find the idea of it incredibly cool.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#23

Oh, you mean scrobbling? That thing last.fm has done forever? And it only activates when you go into the status update UI? Sad that there's not a single, not even one positive mention of this feature here. I'm starting to think this whole privacy thing has turned a lot of you into luddites. I'm serious. The highest rated fucking comment is a post that takes a line from 1984 and replaces "telescreen" with "iphone". Ye…

Oh, and this has nothing to do with Facebook's atrocious behavior in all things privacy?

Unless your fear is that Facebook wants to record your conversations on the sly, then yes, that is a completely insane thing to be worried about, and I'd ask for proof.

Facebook doing what Shazam does doesn't somehow make it more skeevy.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#24
post #12

I think I read about this in a book once... "The iPhone received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the helpful sign suggested, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being checked-in on social media any given mo…

It is fairly ironic that you use iPhone in your example considering that with side loading and permission over reach any talented hacker can access an Android phone to the level you describe while you would almost have to be a nation state to pull it off on a non-jailbroken iPhone.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#26

Seems like this thread is full of people typing while wearing tinfoil hats. They have added a feature which works the same way Shazam et al do. You want to share what you're listening to? Press a button, the mic gets activated, and Facebook ID's the song for you to save you typing it out and searching yourself. They are not listening to you all the time, even when you're in the Facebook app.

Shazam doesn't try to run itself passively and report back to HQ when I don't need it to run.

Shazam also isn't the same level of data mining/profiling.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#27
post #12

I think I read about this in a book once... "The iPhone received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the helpful sign suggested, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being checked-in on social media any given mo…

[deleted]

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#28
post #12

I think I read about this in a book once... "The iPhone received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the helpful sign suggested, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being checked-in on social media any given mo…

It is fairly ironic that you use iPhone in your example considering that with side loading and permission over reach any talented hacker can access an Android phone to the level you describe while you would almost have to be a nation state to pull it off on a non-jailbroken iPhone.

Then you may have missed a break in the third quarter of the telecast of Super Bowl XVIII by CBS. Advertising Age placed it on the top of its list of 50 greatest commercials.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#29
post #13

Situational awareness and semi-passive alternative inputs is being added to more and more devices. The always waiting your command "Ok Google" thing that Android phones and "Ok Glass" that Google Glass do comes to mind. Same for the XBOX One, only in that case it's also got a camera aimed at your livingroom. The Nest knows when there are people present. And now Facebook can listen to your surroundings while you post…

I wish "Ok Google" was always waiting - Instead you have to initiate it.

It's pretty awesome when you've dirty hands and can't touch the phone, but you need to turn it on, and unlock it first.

Re: Facebook wants to 'listen' to your music and TV

#30
post #12

I think I read about this in a book once... "The iPhone received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it, moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the helpful sign suggested, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being checked-in on social media any given mo…

It is fairly ironic that you use iPhone in your example considering that with side loading and permission over reach any talented hacker can access an Android phone to the level you describe while you would almost have to be a nation state to pull it off on a non-jailbroken iPhone.

with side loading and permission over reach

a non-jailbroken iPhone

You don't think it's a little unfair to compare a sideloaded (thus, compromised) Android phone with a non-compromised, non-jailbroken iPhone?

Post reply on HN