Live data from Hacker News

Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

wired.com

21–28 of 28 posts

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#21
post #17
post #9

For years, before Instapaper and Readability, I used a little script that copied the text out of the current page and pasted it in plaintext, then printed it from TextMate monospaced and 4-up. I'd shove the pages in a pocket or the backseat and read them in my free time. It's a great way to take notes, circle interesting bits, and compare them later. I haven't been able to replicate that system digitally.

Is there a reason you chose a monospace font? I recall reading that they have lower legibility for prose.

I remember it being a mix of tinyness, printer quality, and TextMate's limitations. It had the side effect of lending everything a particularly neutral tone.

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#24
Physical books give me the third dimension which is necessary for the ability to flip back and forth between sections or even pages very fast. This process, at least for me, is very critical to reading that is focused on knowledge-gaining rather than fun. Forget books; I find it uncomfortable and very little productive while reading academic papers on my iPad. These papers in my field are usually 15-30 pages long and often have double columns (so now I have to even zoom in).

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#25
Paper: among characteristics not mentioned, where a passage occurs in a page (or how far within a book or article) is part of the context, and I suspect that human's spatial memory comes into play with this. Online infinite-scrolling content lacks this particular clue, and even PDFs only offer the "where on the page" vs. "how far into the book" aspect. I can also often remember my place in a book simply by staring at the page number and committing it to memory -- at least for a few hours or overnight. Though bookmarks are useful.

Electronic: Over half a century into the digital age and I think a significant problem is that we still haven't settled on the "right" format for real information consumption. There are plain-text documents, simple HTML, word-processing formats, postscript and PDF documents, and now eBook formats. Absent its lack of text search, ghostview -- 'gv' on Linux -- is still one of the best reading clients I know of, particularly in how it advances through the text. The Internet Archive's online book reader is the best I've seen bar none, in particular its light-weight feel and auto-cropping of text so that the actual content of the book is centered on the page. I've submitted a request to evince (the GNOME PDF reader) that it do similarly. Still, I find myself constantly fighting with even the best PDF readers at finding the right balance between text sized large enough to read and fiddling with positioning the page onscreen.

Electronic formats may not be as good for first encounter and deep studying, but they are immensely useful for quick reference: the ability to 1) carry around a library of thousands of volumes and 2) instantly search to or open to a particular page or phrase is hugely useful. The ability to create an external reference that will find the relevant passage in whatever form of the work you have handy (similar to a URL, but not specific to a given instance) would be magical.

Some limitations of electronic formats can be mitigated somewhat: there are bookmarks, annotations, and other forms of marking up documents, though none match the immediacy of a penciled margin note, underlined passage, or dog-eared page.

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#26
post #10

Asimov wrote an essay in 1973 "The Ancient and the Ultimate" about a portable reading device that didn't need power etc; it turned out it was the book.

That was an excellent essay. It started off speculating about the future of the video cassette. He speculated that they would eventually be mobile with a self-contained power source, and that they would be able to present their images to you without disturbing those around you. Controls would become almost automatic. They would stop when you looked away and resume when you looked back, and you could skip around or repeat sections at will, and play the cassette at your own pace. He finishes:

   You'll have to admit that such a cassette would
   be a perfect futuristic dream: self-contained,
   mobile, non-energy-consuming, perfectly private,
   and largely under the control of the will.

   Ah, but dreams are cheap so let's get practical.
   Can such a cassette possibly exist? To this, my
   answer is Yes, of course. The next question is:
   How many years will we have to wait for such a
   deliriously perfect cassette?

   I have an aster for that, too, and a quite
   definite one. We will have it in minus five
   thousand years--because what I have been
   describing...is a book!

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#27
post #5
post #2

> And research finds that kids these days consistently prefer their textbooks in print rather than pixels. My students only look at their textbook for the assigned exercises. I'm sure they'd prefer not to have one at all.

What are they studying? I find that scientific textbooks (machine learning, etc) are much more usable as books than as pdf, as I need to often jump from one chapter to another and it needs to be the matter of a split second (or I won't bother to look for the information). But perhaps mileage varies.

Math. Students pretty much don't read their textbooks from algebra through calculus. And it's even sadder when you get a student in PDEs or abstract algebra who acts as if reading their textbook would reveal their illiteracy.

This is probably because you can get through many early math classes just by listening to the lectures.

Re: Why the Smart Reading Device of the Future May Be Paper

#28

I'd be very curious to see if it's age dependent. I agree that I absorb more with the printed page, but I wonder if this is habit or conditioning. I didn't grow up reading material on a device. Disclaimer: I'm old :).

I think the article can be summarized by this sentence: "When students preferred screen reading, they learned less when required to read from paper, and vice versa."

I'm pretty sure this is all just a matter of personal preference.

Post reply on HN