Comic Sans? Really? Edit: To those downvoting, yes, I saw the footer. This doesn't excuse their childish behavior. I will not be donating to this project if this is the level of seriousness they have for it.
Maybe you should consider donating
LibreSSL
21–30 of 262 posts
Re: LibreSSL
#22Re: LibreSSL
#23Re: LibreSSL
#24This page scientifically designed to annoy web hipsters. Donate now to stop the Comic Sans and Blink Tags
Re: LibreSSL
#25Re: LibreSSL
#26Somewhat ironic that https://www.libressl.org/ doesn't work, no?
Re: LibreSSL
#27Somewhat ironic that https://www.libressl.org/ doesn't work, no?
Not really considering you have to buy certs if you want people to use your site, it doesn't have any sensitive data on it (not even source code or binaries), and they haven't finished cleaning it up to their standards yet.
As for why SSL should be used everywhere: It improves security and makes eavesdropping more expensive. For the first point, see the BEAST and CRIME attacks. On vulnerable systems, a single unencrypted connection may be used to reveal data from other, encrypted streams. As for the second: if only sensitive data is encrypted, all encrypted streams automatically become "interesting" to a potential eavesdropper. If, however, everything is encrypted, all streams become equal again. The cost of storing all communications becomes much higher, and the ratio of cost and reward of decrypting a single captured stream worsens (as you may either reveal sensitive or non-sensitive data).
[2] http://www.instantssl.com/ssl-certificate-products/free-ssl-...
Re: LibreSSL
#28I understand the point but this comes across as immature. OpenSSL has provided years of free software, supporting thousands of sites and applications. Of course it has its problems, and there is nothing wrong with adding more competition in this space. But what this space needs now, more than ever, is professionalism and pride in craft (by which I mean demonstrable unit test coverage, regression testing, fuzz testing…
Re: LibreSSL
#29I understand the point but this comes across as immature. OpenSSL has provided years of free software, supporting thousands of sites and applications. Of course it has its problems, and there is nothing wrong with adding more competition in this space. But what this space needs now, more than ever, is professionalism and pride in craft (by which I mean demonstrable unit test coverage, regression testing, fuzz testing…
On a side note, I was really hoping for the name to be OpenTLS (consistent with OpenBSD and OpenSSH, which are also OpenBSD maintained projects) or ValhallaTLS