Isn’t the node.js version of the ruby one ? ie: http://progrium.com/localtunnel/ Or the Go version: https://github.com/inconshreveable/ngrok
Localtunnel.me
21–30 of 51 posts
Re: Localtunnel.me
#22Re: Localtunnel.me
#23Re: Localtunnel.me
#24I'm confused, there is an existing project called localtunnel that does exactly the same thing and dominates search results for "localtunnel". At the very least, pick a different name. http://progrium.com/localtunnel/
Re: Localtunnel.me
#25I'm sure I'm missing some obvious disadvantage…
Re: Localtunnel.me
#26For example:
ssh -f -N -q -R 2222:localhost:22 my_name@remote.example.com
Decent writeup here:
Re: Localtunnel.me
#27You can also use ngrok.com which has been around for quite a while. The developer even responds very quickly to support requests. As a bonus, you also get: - Custom (sub) domains - TLS tunnels if you want, not mandatory - Other protocols than just HTTP/S
Re: Localtunnel.me
#28Re: Localtunnel.me
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Jeff's localtunnel has been discontinued in favor of Ngrok. It was discontinued in the middle of a transition from ruby to python.
Is there a writeup somewhre of what happened? localtunnel v1 worked perfectly for me, localtunnelv2 never did (apparently no remote server was ever up) but it's weird that ngrok is a ruby project again.