Someone less than that, or for that price but without having to devote staff, would make sense for some customers.
Sort of like MarkMonitor, I guess.
21–30 of 57 posts
Someone less than that, or for that price but without having to devote staff, would make sense for some customers.
Sort of like MarkMonitor, I guess.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You actually want both - you want all of the automatic safety checks to be first completed, and then, after all of them have been passed, you want an account manager to personally pick up the phone, and call their contact at the company making the change, and have a discussion as to what is trying to be done, and whether everything is kosher.
Sure, for a company, yeah. For my personal domains, I'd rather have cheap and human-free ;)
Although Gandi.net is a fantastic company, their security practices are nothing to write home about. A few years ago, one of my clients lost access to her Gandi.net account. Unfortunately, she had the "disable password resets via email" option set in her account. That should have given her quite a headache, right? Nope. I, an independent contractor who didn't even own the account, was able to convince Gandi support t…
I wonder if this is actually a counter-intuitive advantage of AWS, which, as far as I can tell, offers absolutely zero, zip, nada human support.
Although Gandi.net is a fantastic company, their security practices are nothing to write home about. A few years ago, one of my clients lost access to her Gandi.net account. Unfortunately, she had the "disable password resets via email" option set in her account. That should have given her quite a headache, right? Nope. I, an independent contractor who didn't even own the account, was able to convince Gandi support t…
> And this is not a problem that is specific to Gandi. Even with other online services, it's often quite easy to bypass automated security measures if you go through a human being, whether through the support system or through good ol' snail mail. I wonder if this is actually a counter-intuitive advantage of AWS, which, as far as I can tell, offers absolutely zero, zip, nada human support.
[0] https://portal.aws.amazon.com/gp/aws/html-forms-controller/c...
Can anyone recommend a registrar who takes domain security seriously? (think, £ six digit value domain names)
It's interesting how there are people who think spending $100/year/domain is a lot of money - but when your entire company's business/value is on the line, I would think that spending $1,000/year/domain, to make absolutely sure nothing goes wrong, would be a bargain. It also ensures that your registrar has the resources required to guarantee a very high level of verification and due process to ensure that everything…
Well, we are paying for Gandi's corporate level of support. Funnily enough, we feel the same way about people who don't want to pay $20/year for their email address, given that it's the primary method of identifying yourself online. As with any business expense though, you only want to pay for value - if you spend $1000/year for exactly what you could have got for $100 year, that's wasting money. And we're satisfied…
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, we are paying for Gandi's corporate level of support. Funnily enough, we feel the same way about people who don't want to pay $20/year for their email address, given that it's the primary method of identifying yourself online. As with any business expense though, you only want to pay for value - if you spend $1000/year for exactly what you could have got for $100 year, that's wasting money. And we're satisfied…
With all due respect. I looked at the pricing of fastmail. So is it security the customer is paying for? Because for $10 and $20, you get a rather small max storage (250MB or 1GB). The only way to get a useful amount of data is to pay at least $40 a year. So basically most of the money goes to small data storage. What part of it goes to security and human time to handle security breaches?
You're also paying for multiple replica copies and backups and all that good stuff. By the time you add RAID, search, metadata, etc - there's pretty much a 10:1 ratio between quota usage figures and raw disk used.
Then there's development effort - we're not just installing a couple of packages and then sitting back and letting them run.
This article really should have been called "Security hole in Gandi's processes". Why would they change the account email address if you didn't reply to a single email within 24 hours? Who thought that was a good solution?
A possible reason was called out in the article: "Gandi’s paper 'email reset' form makes a lot of sense in the world where most of their customers are individuals or small businesses with one or two domains, and using addresses that they may lose access to. With no other factors, if they lose access to the email address and forget their password, there needs to be a process to regain access." If a customer loses acce…