Live data from Hacker News

GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

futurist.se

21–30 of 59 posts

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#21

The chart clearly shows that there is a lot of proliferation, which is confusing to a lot of new users. Imagine what would be possible if all these fine developers would focus on two or three distributions. Ps. I am proud that I was a paid co-developer of the very first distribution listed ;).

>Imagine what would be possible if all these fine developers would focus on two or three distributions.

You don't think the lessons learned by those developers' experimentation weren't shared and applied in the decision-making process for more prominent distros? In a way, creating a distro is like contributing to all the other distros at the same time. What makes them fine developers is their drive to innovate and try new things so that one day the status quo can improve. Who knows: if all those developers worked on the same few distributions, they may have crashed and burned.

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The page hit count on http://distrowatch.com/ is sometimes used as a popularity proxy. What do you reckon?

That it's horrible as a popularity index and should never be used as such. The number of visits is very low and the population which visits the site is very selective. Instead use data from highly popular sites like wikipedia: http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportOpera...

I don't think that's really accurate enough either. For example that page says iOS 1 is the most popular version of the OS, way ahead of iOS 7.

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#23
post #15
post #10

I maintain a specific timeline for Debian if anyone is interested: http://timeline.debian.net

That's great. Made me go back to to my early debian days with Potato CDs from the bookstore and a translation of "Debian GNU/Linux: Guide to Installation and Usage". I Could'nt update to woody because it was too costly over the dialup line, so i bought the Woody CD set together with a Friend. Every time i had to install something i had to walk to his house and get the CDs, or pay lots of money (for me as a teenager a…

> Maybe you could add another Frame with Versions of Popular Packages? I'm Thinking KDE, Gnome, GCC, mayor scripting Languages Browsers and Editors?

That's interesting - to give more context to particular eras? I can certainly "place" myself in life when using GNOME 2.8 :)

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#24

The chart clearly shows that there is a lot of proliferation, which is confusing to a lot of new users. Imagine what would be possible if all these fine developers would focus on two or three distributions. Ps. I am proud that I was a paid co-developer of the very first distribution listed ;).

>Imagine what would be possible if all these fine developers would focus on two or three distributions. You don't think the lessons learned by those developers' experimentation weren't shared and applied in the decision-making process for more prominent distros? In a way, creating a distro is like contributing to all the other distros at the same time. What makes them fine developers is their drive to innovate and tr…

You don't think the lessons learned by those developers' experimentation weren't shared and applied in the decision-making process for more prominent distros?

Sometimes. But there is also a lot of 'let's take Ubuntu and change the default desktop/wallpaper/DVD package set/...'.

Also, it's not as if developers in major distributions such as Debian don't have room to experiment with different approaches. For instance, in Debian, the default init system discussion rages. The most promising candidates are already available in Debian itself.

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#26
post #25
post #19

What about all the distributions that don't include GNU, or those that only include a tiny proportion of GNU code, is there a chart that includes those?

They don't actually exist - it's just hot air from the anti-GNU crowd.

Did you mean this comment to be sarcastic? Android and a lot of embedded Linux distributions are not GNU/Linux.

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#28
Such a waste of time and manpower creating all these forks. I wish folks spent time scratching their itch by writing great software for Linux instead of trying to reinvent the same wheel. And yet folks will continue to fork platform trying to solve problem that doesn't exist.

Re: GNU/Linux Distribution Timeline

#30

Such a waste of time and manpower creating all these forks. I wish folks spent time scratching their itch by writing great software for Linux instead of trying to reinvent the same wheel. And yet folks will continue to fork platform trying to solve problem that doesn't exist.

Like is not happening in every other platform.
Post reply on HN