Live data from Hacker News

Response to Nodejitsu NPM Trademark

gist.github.com

21–22 of 22 posts

Re: Response to Nodejitsu NPM Trademark

#21
post #5

I wonder how it relates to a few npm forks ( https://github.com/rlidwka/yapm , https://github.com/visionmedia/npm ) created earlier this year, especially to second one since @visionmedia didn't change its name... And what about alternate npm-compatible registries ( https://github.com/mbrevoort/node-reggie , https://github.com/rlidwka/sinopia , https://github.com/cnpm/cnpmjs.org ), not based on CouchDB? "npm" isn't on…

Even without a trademark, the npm source has been Artistic License v2 for as long as I can remember, so any forks are obligated to change their name to have the right to forking the source code.

Re: Response to Nodejitsu NPM Trademark

#22
post #4
post #2

so who owns npm?

Well, before Jason Smith started to try to monetize npm, I would have said nobody. It's open source, right? After, well, he's the first one to do it, and it's not as though anyone else was in that space. So to me he has a better claim than Nodejitsu. It's possible that my knowledge is incomplete though so if anyone knows better please correct my misconceptions. I can't really see Nodejitsu's claim here. Also, why did…

> Well, before Jason Smith started to try to monetize npm, I would have said nobody. It's open source, right?

That's not what open source man. There are still copyright notices in open source code.

Post reply on HN