Live data from Hacker News

Startup failure post-mortems

cbinsights.com

21–24 of 24 posts

Re: Startup failure post-mortems

#21
post #8

It always seems so obvious in retrospect but it's hard to think clearly when you're in the gist of doing it and you have a mountain on your shoulders. Something - how so stupid, I'll admit - that I realized is that even if smart people tell you something, you often need to fail it first to really get it. Pick the right co-founders? It's one of the most basic rules.. but how many entrepreneurs do you know didn't liste…

> even if smart people tell you something, you often need to fail it first to really get it.

That was really emphasized for me after my first startup failed. After we pulled the plug, all the advice I had procured in the previous months suddenly made sense.

I think that when you hear advice, it might make sense but you don't really understand it. It is analogous to reading a textbook and thinking you've got it covered until you actually reproduce what you learned. That's when the real learning happens. You just need to buck up and get your hands dirty.

Re: Startup failure post-mortems

#22
post #14

I doubt these post-mortems are accurate. If you can't create a successful company, what makes you think you know why a company was unsuccessful? It's just more mental masturbation. Even if the failure mode is identified, it doesn't help you with the next startup, as most of the time humans work by trial and error. A failure doesn't teach most how to succeed, just how not to fail in that exact way.

this is the obverse of the idea that just because you succeed does not necessarily know why you succeeded. You do not have the full view in either case.
Post reply on HN