Live data from Hacker News

A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

stackoverflow.com

21–30 of 45 posts

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#21

I think this was supposed to show the crap Stack Overflow power users have to deal with, but I think it more clearly shows some of the worst qualities of the Stack Overflow moderation system. With a large caveat that moderators have the ability to scrub context from a problem question (e.g., comments) and user (e.g., deleting their past submissions), this is what appears to the outside world: * A new user asks what t…

What you've described is not at all what happened. > Still thinking it was a dumb question and not knowing how Stack Overflow works, attempts to blank out the question and request deletion. No, the user rewrote his entire post to ok i got my answers, we can delete this post now, i am not helping google users. He then added IF YOU GUYS ROLL BACK AGAIN, I AM CHANGING MY NICK TO " ALLAH AKBAR " AND YOU WILL ALL LOOK LIK…

> The post was unlocked a week later by Stack Overflow's robot ("Community"), automatically.

Thanks, corrected.

> In fact, I'm willing to wager that the user flagged the question immediately but it took an hour for one of the moderators to get around to it.

I would hope so, and I thank you for calling this line out, because I forgot one imporant action. As a moderator yourself, you know that the appropriate action once a user rolls back a valid edit to the question is to flag the question for a moderator and move on, which obviously didn't happen. I've amended my original comment.

> What you've described is not at all what happened.

Outside of those two minor points, it doesn't seem like you disagree with my account.

-----

To address the edit you made after I replied:

> No, the user rewrote his entire post to

> > ok i got my answers, we can delete this post now, i am not helping google users.

That sounds like blanking out his question and requesting deletion to me.

> He then added

> > IF YOU GUYS ROLL BACK AGAIN, I AM CHANGING MY NICK TO " ALLAH AKBAR " AND YOU WILL ALL LOOK LIKE JIHAD CLUB MEMBERS OF OSAMA BIN LADEN.

He added that in revision 8, after the power user reverted his question 3 times in less than a minute.

As a moderator yourself, you know that every day users come to Stack Exchange that don't know how the system works, it's a given, and they'll make mistakes. This question did not deserve the treatment it got but this type of thing happens with too much frequency for whatever reason: jaded power users, too large of a review queue, whatever. My point here is that while this looks like "mission accomplished" for a Stack Exchange power user, from an outside perspective, this looks positively kafkaesque.

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#22
post #7
post #4

What kind of jerk has his question answered by the Stackoverflow community, then insist it be pulled so others don't benefit?

Revision #8 is insane... I don't understand what goes through his head

He's PHP "developer", figures.

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#25
post #4

What kind of jerk has his question answered by the Stackoverflow community, then insist it be pulled so others don't benefit?

I did some analysis and I found out that roughly 1/8 of the delete questions on Stackoverflow are deleted by the author of the question.

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#26

I think this was supposed to show the crap Stack Overflow power users have to deal with, but I think it more clearly shows some of the worst qualities of the Stack Overflow moderation system. With a large caveat that moderators have the ability to scrub context from a problem question (e.g., comments) and user (e.g., deleting their past submissions), this is what appears to the outside world: * A new user asks what t…

15 years?! I didn't know moderators could set arbitrary dates for a "temporary suspension". A month would be reasonable for a first offense I would think.

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#27
post #20
post #4

What kind of jerk has his question answered by the Stackoverflow community, then insist it be pulled so others don't benefit?

The user clearly believes it is his duty to prevent Google from unfairly benefitting from the existence of the question.

What he fails to realize is that the site that just helped him depends on Google for a large portion of their traffic (and thus, revenue).

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#29

I think this was supposed to show the crap Stack Overflow power users have to deal with, but I think it more clearly shows some of the worst qualities of the Stack Overflow moderation system. With a large caveat that moderators have the ability to scrub context from a problem question (e.g., comments) and user (e.g., deleting their past submissions), this is what appears to the outside world: * A new user asks what t…

15 years?! I didn't know moderators could set arbitrary dates for a "temporary suspension". A month would be reasonable for a first offense I would think.

It was an automatically created "session" user (http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/44557/why-should-i-r...), an anonymous user given an ad hoc account which they can later convert into a normal account. I don't know that issuing this ban in itself blocks that person from signing up for another account tomorrow. Places like Wikipedia get more sophisticated to prevent so-called "sock puppetry", I'm not sure if SO does the same automatically when an account is banned.

Re: A day in the life of a stackoverflow moderator...

#30
post #4

What kind of jerk has his question answered by the Stackoverflow community, then insist it be pulled so others don't benefit?

I did some analysis and I found out that roughly 1/8 of the delete questions on Stackoverflow are deleted by the author of the question.

Do you know the context of those though? I delete my questions from time-to-time because they're very specific to my setup or they end up being something really basic like a missing semicolon or a typo somewhere.
Post reply on HN