The engineer who fixed his own heart
21–30 of 43 posts
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#22am i the only one who was expecting a Tony Stark photo ?
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#23For the ones wondering how the device looks like: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/16/article-1243723-07...
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
[deleted]
I think your brother is probably rolling his eyes when he agrees that yes it would be great if we had a cheap and effective universal mass screening tool for cancer. I mean, why would -any- doctor not want that. Why would any cancer researcher not want that. Oh, but it would mean they would lose their funding you say. But in exchange, you get ever-lasting fame. Oh, and you don't have to worry about having probes shov…
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#25Aorta wrapping was actually pioneered in the 1950's, before the graft replacements that the article mentions, but generally the wrapping had a poor result and was abandonded as a technique. (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1802172/pdf/anns... ) Generally the trend in vascular surgery these days is to less invasive procedures such as a stent graft.
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#26Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#27This sounds like a great thing.
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#28The "garden-hose wrap" method described in this article was not mentioned to me, probably because it would have no use on the more important failure, the stretched valve.
However, I was given a clear choice of replacement valve: metal or tissue. Tal Golesworthy presumably would have had the same choice, but the article doesn't mention that there is a choice.
The metal (actually metal frame with a carbon-fiber flap) replacement valve lasts pretty much forever. On the minus side, it sometimes has a harmless, but audible "tick" noise, but its main drawback is that it can be a source of blood clots, hence the need for the lifelong course of blood thinner. Miss a few days and you could have a stroke from a clot.
I opted for the tissue valve, which is taken from a pig (or a cow, if you object to pork products). All its cells removed, leaving only the collagen form, so there's no host-graft immune reaction. It's silent, it doesn't encourage clot formation -- but it doesn't last forever. At some point in the next decade I'll need another one.
The new valve and about 7 inches of new Dacron aortic arch were sewed in. The surgeon commented afterward that my removed aorta "felt very soft" and was "poor quality tissue" and that I was "fortunate" that it hadn't failed.
This leads me to wonder: a common failure mode of the aorta is Aortic Dissection[2] in which the tube delaminates. Rather than bursting, the lining separates from the supporting wall, and high-pressure blood gets between the layers and spreads them, reducing the cross-section of the pipe. (It's reputed to be one of the most painful experiences possible.) My wonder is: while the "hose-wrap" fix described in this article might prevent ruptures, would it be an effective preventative for aortic dissection?
[0]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annuloaortic_ectasia [1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marfan_syndrome [2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aortic_dissection
Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#29Re: The engineer who fixed his own heart
#30I have some personal experience with the related problem. At age 60 a gradually increasing "murmur" led to a diagnosis of Aortic Ectasia[0], a stretching of the ring of muscle that is the base for the aortic valve. As the valve widens, the three leaflets overlap less and the valve doesn't seal properly, making the heart less efficient. In addition my ascending aorta, the big arched tube that is the subject of the abo…
This is me: