Let's make a movement to call W "wub". It uses its own sound, it is one syllable, and it sounds like "dub" (as in "double U"). As a bonus side effect, "www" will sound like dubstep.
'W' Considered Harmful
21–30 of 51 posts
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#22It has always annoyed me that "world wide web" is significantly faster to say than "www".
Yes but is great fun seeing people say out web address's. Ah the early days when they spelt out the http:// part as well. If it was realy a bother though somebody would of pulled a Prince and called it squiggle. ALl this though is based upon English use of the letter W, sure other languages have there own quirks and idiosims.
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#23Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#24Just give it a more efficient name. In German it's referred to as [veː].
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#25Wait a minute, there are significant backward-compatibility concerns to be addressed before we shorten the pronunciation of "W". How will we fill the extra two syllables in the ABC song?
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#26thats why i just say dub dub dub for www. There couldnt be a worse standard subdomain. Also great article.. if you are interested in measuring words and speech, we should talk ;)
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#27thats why i just say dub dub dub for www. There couldnt be a worse standard subdomain. Also great article.. if you are interested in measuring words and speech, we should talk ;)
Save a syllable: trip-dub.
Wub-wub-Wub-wub in the sky with diamonds.
Re: 'W' Considered Harmful
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
And, of course, w's name does contain one of the vowel sounds that w forms (the long u), just like y's does (the long i). Neither of those letters name contains their own consonant sound.
Wait, when does 'w' make the sound [u] (as opposed to [w] or [ʊ])?