Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, 'Solar' refers to our sun, Sol. So there is only one 'Solar' system which is our own. I think 'star system' is acceptable as well.
I'm not disagreeing, but genuinely curious: what do astronomers call the "solar wind" in other systems? Referring to every wind by the star's name would seem odd.
Seven-Planet System Detected
21–30 of 78 posts
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#22"The star is 2500 light years away from Earth." Found that on google. Doesn't seem so far away :P
Yeah, unreachable without FTL travel.
If you accept any ship could get there, you might as well consider that space travel isn't the only technology that will advance.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#23"The star is 2500 light years away from Earth." Found that on google. Doesn't seem so far away :P
just three years at warp 9 =)
In the TV shows and movies, they never seem to spend more than a few days at a time going anywhere at warp speed.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
just three years at warp 9 =)
It's strange to realize that even at Warp 9, it still take a very long time to get anywhere much. In the TV shows and movies, they never seem to spend more than a few days at a time going anywhere at warp speed.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would take about 15.6 years [0] to reach the star on a ship capable of a constant 1G acceleration. Here is the explanation and equations: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.h... [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6637131
It is dubious we will ever travel faster than 10% the speed of light. But a probe might be able to.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4534359
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6238297
Although, I certainly wouldn't bet against it long term.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would take about 15.6 years [0] to reach the star on a ship capable of a constant 1G acceleration. Here is the explanation and equations: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/rocket.h... [0]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6637131
15.6 years for the passenger, thousands of years from our perspective.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#27Hang on, I thought 'Solar system' means the system orbiting the star 'Sol' i.e. our sun? Isn't the general term 'planetary system'?
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's strange to realize that even at Warp 9, it still take a very long time to get anywhere much. In the TV shows and movies, they never seem to spend more than a few days at a time going anywhere at warp speed.
Hell, in the new movies, you can transport from Earth to the Klingon homeworld instantly, and fly there in like 20 minutes.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does this take the needed deceleration in account? If we are to land there anyway :P
Yes, but the real problem is fuel( even with antimatter ). And radiation.
2 * T(1250 lyr) = 2 * (c/a) arccosh (ad/c^2 + 1) = 2 * arccosh(1250 + 1) = 2 * 7.8 = 15.6 yr.
Re: Seven-Planet System Detected
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, 'Solar' refers to our sun, Sol. So there is only one 'Solar' system which is our own. I think 'star system' is acceptable as well.
I'm not disagreeing, but genuinely curious: what do astronomers call the "solar wind" in other systems? Referring to every wind by the star's name would seem odd.