REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
21–30 of 117 posts
Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#22> On average, 98.5% of polls are wasted Erm. Is there a source for that?
Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#23Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#24Are there patterns for client side JavaScript to be notified of changes to REST resources? I don't believe this particular pattern applies if I understand correctly as it needs a URL to notify.
Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#25In addition to webhooks, using a websocket connection to listen for streaming updates is a great way to eliminate polling.
Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#26Am I the only one who has trouble sifting through all this marketing? Even "read more" link leads to an article where half of the text promises what will be covered and another half talks about some subscriptions and how they are managed (they might have been mentioned in the first half, I agree - and I also read text only twice). If someone has a better understanding of how this works, I would appreciate a TL;DR ver…
REST Hooks itself is not a specification, it is a collection of patterns that
treat webhooks like subscriptions. These subscriptions are manipulated via a
REST API just like any other resource. That's it. Really.
Thanks for the feedback!Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#27Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#28Has anyone use PubSubHubbub ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubSubHubbub ) for this pattern in the past? For straight subscriptions, it's always been compelling to think of the use cases being covered by PSHB and RSS.
Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#29Re: REST Hooks - Stop the polling madness
#30> On average, 98.5% of polls are wasted Erm. Is there a source for that?
"Over a representative time period, Zapier polled for changes 30 million times but only took action on 460,000 of those polls (1.5% efficient)."