Who buys this crap? If I a company builds hardware that can profitably mine bitcoins, it will keep the hardware and do the mining itself rather than selling it into the market.
ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
21–30 of 50 posts
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#22Who buys this crap? If I a company builds hardware that can profitably mine bitcoins, it will keep the hardware and do the mining itself rather than selling it into the market.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes of course: https://btct.co/ https://bitfunder.com/ http://mpex.co/ https://www.havelockinvestments.com/ It's all risky and low volume, as you might expect. Then there's also OTC with people doing auctions on forums, etc.
> * This is a virtual stock exchange using virtual currency. Virtual goods utilized on this site are for entertainment and educational purposes only. So the favorable interpretation would be that this is a toy exchange... The other possibility being a conveyor of unregistered securities.
ding ding ding
BTCTC also announced they were considering blocking all U.S. users to avoid confronting the SEC, even though I believe they run in another country.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#24Who buys this crap? If I a company builds hardware that can profitably mine bitcoins, it will keep the hardware and do the mining itself rather than selling it into the market.
I don't know that this automatically follows: lots of companies produce equipment for other companies to use on making profit in markets they themselves don't work in. It's entirely possible for a company to want to manufacture ASICs/boards and not want to run a server farm and deal with that level of IT for bitcoin mining.
The most plausible explanation I've heard is that these hardware companies need deposits to pay the development costs, then plan to run the chips themselves. Anyone who doesn't use such a strategy, is not expecting their customers to break even on their investment.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
> * This is a virtual stock exchange using virtual currency. Virtual goods utilized on this site are for entertainment and educational purposes only. So the favorable interpretation would be that this is a toy exchange... The other possibility being a conveyor of unregistered securities.
> The other possibility being a conveyor of unregistered securities. ding ding ding BTCTC also announced they were considering blocking all U.S. users to avoid confronting the SEC, even though I believe they run in another country.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#263.5 bitcoin is roughly $450. If you bought one now and started it running in September, you will likely never break-even or make a profit: http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/a65c154190
I got an opportunity to buy (10) USB BE's at 0.11BTC per and even had enough coin purchased at well under $100, and I'm still worried about break-even. Even if I make my money back, I know in the back of my mind the opportunity cost of selling the miners now makes mining with them a theoretical loss. They'll make great mementos of the early ASIC's anyway.
People are getting rich quick (not a good thing) off of selling hardware to quick-to-decide geeks that like the idea of btc, and making money from a terminal line. I'll be the first to admit that I'm one of those geeks.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#273.5 bitcoin is roughly $450. If you bought one now and started it running in September, you will likely never break-even or make a profit: http://mining.thegenesisblock.com/a/a65c154190
As as long as you credit the mining reward to a wallet that has no connection to your real-world finances, and take other safety precautions, those coins would not be traceable to you. So this could be used to launder money through the Bitcoin network. The only evidence that you were doing something would be an abnormally large electricity bill.
Mind you, without this turning into Office Space, I'm sure there's more effective ways to launder money...
But if that's true, then I would expect the supply of mining capacity to settle above the point where it's profitable, because some fraction of miners don't really care about being profitable as long it's a reasonable loss.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that's the point though right? Its an arms race with a nearly perfectly efficient market that will (in the future) not be a get-rich-quick scheme for miners. If there's profit to be made easily, the some people will react by mining more and then it 'fixes' the market. Assume that some people will act irrationally and mine inefficiently, or with the hope that the market will skyrocket- these people will bring…
Not really. If you're trying to sell a bitcoin miner, you want at least the chance for the operators to make money. If you can take the specs of the box and calculate that you won't make a profit even if it was running right now , why would you buy it? The company selling them is going to do badly. It's like trying to sell shovels to gold prospectors, but for more money than the price of the gold that they'll dig up.
So, IOW, exactly like selling shovels to gold prospectors during a gold rush. Which is why the people selling shovels, or assaying services, or everything else that supports prospectors always, on average, do far better than prospectors during a gold rush.
That changes when the rush starts to end and become more of a rational market.
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#29> After reaching an all-time high of 5.15 BTC per share on July 3rd they have dropped 48% to 2.71 BTC per share as of today. Pardon? Is there a stock market that trades in BTC?
Re: ASICMiner Blade Prices Reduced 65% After Shares Crash
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think that's the point though right? Its an arms race with a nearly perfectly efficient market that will (in the future) not be a get-rich-quick scheme for miners. If there's profit to be made easily, the some people will react by mining more and then it 'fixes' the market. Assume that some people will act irrationally and mine inefficiently, or with the hope that the market will skyrocket- these people will bring…
Not really. If you're trying to sell a bitcoin miner, you want at least the chance for the operators to make money. If you can take the specs of the box and calculate that you won't make a profit even if it was running right now , why would you buy it? The company selling them is going to do badly. It's like trying to sell shovels to gold prospectors, but for more money than the price of the gold that they'll dig up.