You know something's wrong with your RSS reader when it has a support queue, and people are willing to pay for bumping to the front of it.
Feedly Pro
21–30 of 68 posts
Re: Feedly Pro
#22If anyone working for feedly reads this: SSL/https should not be a premium feature. Please make it available to everyone. Update: they tweeted "HTTPS is currently a pro only feature. Will extend it to everyone when we have a way to fund it." (see https://twitter.com/feedly/status/364292745487065088 )
Is it really that expensive for them to run? Last time I heard it was a a minuscule amount per request, and peanuts for the certificate itself.
Re: Feedly Pro
#23Re: Feedly Pro
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
selling https access doesn't sound like a good one for me, this should be a basic feature with NSA and who knows who else listening in on everything.
If you want some privacy, you have to pay for it. Is that really that unreasonable?
Re: Feedly Pro
#25You know something's wrong with your RSS reader when it has a support queue, and people are willing to pay for bumping to the front of it.
Are there any products with actual users and no support queue?
Re: Feedly Pro
#26Great that they've settled on a business model, but I feel like if you are going to have a free tier that HTTPS should be part of it.
I do not think HTTPS is in any way a required feature for a feedreader. It’s pretty perfect as a premium feature.
Re: Feedly Pro
#27If anyone working for feedly reads this: SSL/https should not be a premium feature. Please make it available to everyone. Update: they tweeted "HTTPS is currently a pro only feature. Will extend it to everyone when we have a way to fund it." (see https://twitter.com/feedly/status/364292745487065088 )
Seriously. You shouldn't have to pay to expect a reasonable amount of security as a user.
This seems like a privacy feature (something not necessarily everyone cares about when it comes to their feedreading), not security.
Re: Feedly Pro
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously. You shouldn't have to pay to expect a reasonable amount of security as a user.
Security? Where do you see security issues outside of login data (which is already over HTTPS)? This seems like a privacy feature (something not necessarily everyone cares about when it comes to their feedreading), not security.
Re: Feedly Pro
#29If anyone working for feedly reads this: SSL/https should not be a premium feature. Please make it available to everyone. Update: they tweeted "HTTPS is currently a pro only feature. Will extend it to everyone when we have a way to fund it." (see https://twitter.com/feedly/status/364292745487065088 )
> Will extend it to everyone when we have a way to fund it. Is it really that expensive for them to run? Last time I heard it was a a minuscule amount per request, and peanuts for the certificate itself.
Re: Feedly Pro
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Seriously. You shouldn't have to pay to expect a reasonable amount of security as a user.
Security? Where do you see security issues outside of login data (which is already over HTTPS)? This seems like a privacy feature (something not necessarily everyone cares about when it comes to their feedreading), not security.