Typing on the iPad virtual keyboard is fine. Just like when you were learning to type on a physical keyboard, it takes practice up front. I can easily type 50 WPM on the virtual keyboard, and I'm not alone. See also: my app TapTyping.
IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
21–30 of 47 posts
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#22The displayed workflow is horrendous. And that's just one aspect of the sub-par experience of doing "real work" on pure touch screen devices. The poll sums it all up nicely. What users want is real multitasking, a keyboard, and features that are on a desktop. Seems pretty clear that the users don't want an iOS/Android device, they want a laptop/desktop with a real OS. No app can solve that, no matter how much funding…
I personally just think it comes down to screen real estate. Small screens are hard to do anything productive. I still remember trying to type up a paper in college on an Acer netbook. Even with a full "laptop experience", it was a horrible and scarring experience.
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#23I'm unsympathetic. The only thing that held back non-Apple mobile platforms was the app ecosystem. The Play Store has definitely caught up with the App Store. Even if you don't think it does, the versatility of Android really does beat that of iOS. iOS isn't going anywhere for the general populace, but I see little benefit for its use in the tech community. I'm not one of those "iOS is a toy for idiots" detractors, b…
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#24Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#25Typing is such a widely voiced complaint because it's new and difficult at first and requires practice . Instead of putting in the effort, almost everyone assumes the virtual keyboard paradigm is broken and simply throws their hands up in the air in frustration. It baffles me. Typing on the iPad virtual keyboard is fine. Just like when you were learning to type on a physical keyboard, it takes practice up front. I ca…
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#26Typing is such a widely voiced complaint because it's new and difficult at first and requires practice . Instead of putting in the effort, almost everyone assumes the virtual keyboard paradigm is broken and simply throws their hands up in the air in frustration. It baffles me. Typing on the iPad virtual keyboard is fine. Just like when you were learning to type on a physical keyboard, it takes practice up front. I ca…
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#27Typing is such a widely voiced complaint because it's new and difficult at first and requires practice . Instead of putting in the effort, almost everyone assumes the virtual keyboard paradigm is broken and simply throws their hands up in the air in frustration. It baffles me. Typing on the iPad virtual keyboard is fine. Just like when you were learning to type on a physical keyboard, it takes practice up front. I ca…
After two years, I disagree with this. I have to consistently concentrate on the physical act of typing and not what I'm trying to write.
Either you don't use proper typing style on a physical keyboard (all 10 fingers, each responsible for a specific set of keys), or you haven't put the effort into adapting that typing style for virtual keyboards.
Typing is about training your muscle memory for each finger for each keystroke it could possible be responsible for. Once your muscle memory is trained, it becomes a subconscious skill that you should not need to concentrate on.
The fact that this muscle memory is being used on a virtual keyboard vs. a physical keyboard does not matter whatsoever. The same concept applies.
Edit: email me adam@flairify.com and I'll give you a free download for my paid typing trainer app. It works.
Re: IOS productivity app market on the cusp of change?
#28To get someone to pay, you need to prey on their impulses. Games accomplish this with instant gratification and addiction. For productivity apps, people can justify a purchase because their productivity is worth at the least that price. These are typically pay per downloads and then involve a user to switch to a completely new system. I wouldn't be surprised if engagement & retention are very low despite these high r…
So from that perspective, I would say retention and engagement are low since not many are willing to put the time and effort to do that tool justice.