Live data from Hacker News

Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

qwerjk.com

21–30 of 151 posts

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#21
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When I was using Firefox I used this extension to unify the address/search bars. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/omnibar/

Is this not default behavior? I've never had an addon installed, but just typing in a query and pressing enter in the URL routes it to Google... Edit: Ah, I suppose the auto-complete is different.

Also Sometimes for some non URL queries it defaults to what feels like an 'I'm feeling lucky' search.

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#24
post #11
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Argh, you replied just when I had deleted. Sorry. To anyone wondering my comment was saying that I couldn't find any service comparable to Google's sync last time I tried Firefox. Google's sync effortlessly syncs all machines tied to an account including bookmarks, extensions, and themes. I figured I'd try out the latest Firefox and see if I can get it working before I definitively make the comment. Thanks for the ti…

Firefox sync doesn't do the trick? https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/firefox-sync-take-your-...

It does in theory, but there have been some service problems of late (for a few weeks). I turned it off after growing tired of the error messages.

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#25
post #10
post #4

One question, Why?

Firefox is comparable to Chrome in terms speed and features. However, Mozilla doesn't have the same incentive to collect and use data on their customers that is inherent to Google, an advertising company. In addition to that, Firefox is fully open source, unlike Chrome which contains closed source components from Google.

... and, as I mention above, the Mac version has been pretty bad over the last few months, enough to drive users away (including me).

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#26
post #7

My biggest problems with Firefox after using Chrome for so long is stability. I find that web pages can lock up the entire browser rather than just a tab, and this isn't just a rare occurrence, when I tried to give it a chance a week ago, it happened several times. I am amazed they still haven't picked up the separate process per tab feature yet.

I never could make the switch to Chrome due to the limited interface. That and the Proxy setup being the IE control panel.

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#27

I actually never ended up switching to Chrome from Firefox in the first place, but those are still good tips. I guess I did the right thing :) Yes, it has a terrible memory leak issue, but all of my computers have enough ram as to not notice. I'm still not ready to make the switch to DuckDuckGo. I figure that if I'm going to stick with Gmail no matter what, if Google already has that information, collecting a few sea…

  > Also, perhaps I'm missing something, but as far as I
  > can tell Chrome is at least partially open source, no?
  > http://www.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/get-the-code
  > 
  > Why aren't people forking it to create a more privacy
  > friendly version?
People citing privacy as a reason to move away from Chrome are doing so on moral rather than technical grounds. Chromium itself doesn't have anything harmful in it, so there's no point in forking. Chrome is just Chromium plus some third-party proprietary plugins (Flash, the PDF renderer).

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#28

I made the switch to DDG about 2 years ago and am pretty happy, though I do occasionally use the !g. Switched back to FF on my desktop a couple months ago when I got my keon and I love it. The only thing that's hard to get used to again is a search bar separate from an address bar. Chrome really had that figured out. A unified bar in FF would make it the perfect browser.

Could your (or someone) tell me whether you considered startpage.com at all? I tried both and I liked sp better.

Re: Switching to DuckDuckGo and Firefox

#29
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Firefox is comparable to Chrome in terms speed and features. However, Mozilla doesn't have the same incentive to collect and use data on their customers that is inherent to Google, an advertising company. In addition to that, Firefox is fully open source, unlike Chrome which contains closed source components from Google.

... and, as I mention above, the Mac version has been pretty bad over the last few months, enough to drive users away (including me).

Really? I've been using Nightly exclusively on my laptop and haven't noticed any problems. Maybe just lucky.

Edit: Oh, the mac version of Chrome. Gotcha.

Post reply on HN