Live data from Hacker News

Just a new name: Germany does Not move away form data retention at all

translate.google.com

21–22 of 22 posts

Re: Just a new name: Germany does Not move away form data retention at all

#21
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Have a look at http://www.datenschmutz.de/moin/TK-Verkehrsdaten "Unter dem Stichwort Vorratsdatenspeicherung werden solche Daten speziell für Repressionszwecke gespeichert. Sie ist derzeit ausgesetzt, die Verkehrsdatenabfrage als solche bleibt aber in Kraft." The data detention is "currently suspended" according to your own link... sigh. You did not address the distinction between the police/intelligence agencies hav…

Please, read again what I wrote two comments above. I specifically adressed the difference.

Oops, you're right. Then let's agree to agree on the facts, and sorry for being obtuse. I had the impression you were belittling the fact that Germany is in violation of the EU directive, but that doesn't really follow from what you said, I read that into it.. probably because of "everybody is doing it (what the NSA does)" comments I read occasionally around here, and a general jadedness around the issue. Thanks for your patience ^^

Yes, it it's not great as it is, but it would be worse when the EU directive is actually followed, from what I can tell, and I wanted to stress that.

Re: Just a new name: Germany does Not move away form data retention at all

#22
post #7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The Verfassungsgericht ruled that collected data had to be deleted. Sure provides may store data for themselves - for example for billing purposes.

And such data can be accessed by law enforcement agencies, see http://dejure.org/gesetze/TKG/113.html (also the old version).

Sure, why not. I'm not against that. This has to happen on a case by case basis.
Post reply on HN