Live data from Hacker News

Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken [pdf]

isotropic.org

21–30 of 50 posts

Re: Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken [pdf]

#21
post #12

Interestingly, while Google Scholar has indexed the paper (from another site), it's actually only ranked number 2 for the query "chicken chicken chicken: chicken chicken": http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=chicken+chicken+chicken%...

More interestingly, it has been cited 9 times.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=9396708367921284731&...

Re: Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken [pdf]

#25
post #16

"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" would have at least been grammatically correct.

It is grammatically correct, since nouns can be verbed -- chicken can be a noun, verb and even adjective, even though its verb form doesn't have a defined meaning -- it's just meaningless. Think of it like this:

    struct chicken chicken(struct chicken chicken) {
        return chicken.chicken;
    }
This will parse, it just won't compile, since we're missing the definition of struct chicken.

Contrast with "chicken go fly", which is grammatically incorrect, but meaningful.

Re: Chicken Chicken Chicken: Chicken Chicken [pdf]

#29
post #16

"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo" would have at least been grammatically correct.

It is grammatically correct, since nouns can be verbed -- chicken can be a noun, verb and even adjective, even though its verb form doesn't have a defined meaning -- it's just meaningless. Think of it like this: struct chicken chicken(struct chicken chicken) { return chicken.chicken; } This will parse, it just won't compile, since we're missing the definition of struct chicken. Contrast with "chicken go fly", which i…

It does have a defined meaning, doesn't it? "to chicken (out of something)".
Post reply on HN