1) This article has no new information 2) The linked "Follow Our Progress" form is for email updates 3) Their tumblr blog has no rss link That's not what I call serious. I use their site all the time, but it's no substitute for GR, and I don't want their curation to overpower my feeds. Reader was all about the RSS. At this rate they are sounding like a tardy Prismatic.
Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
21–30 of 72 posts
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#22That could Save Digg. Good Move if they'd succeed!
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#23I have one question I want to propose to the gluttony of companies rushing to replace Google Reader. If it was such a valuable product, why would Google shut it down? I think we are getting too emotional in how we are viewing this market just because a lot of us used Reader. If Google thought there was money to be made with a great RSS reader, they wouldn't have left Reader abandoned for years. If there is a market i…
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#241) This article has no new information 2) The linked "Follow Our Progress" form is for email updates 3) Their tumblr blog has no rss link That's not what I call serious. I use their site all the time, but it's no substitute for GR, and I don't want their curation to overpower my feeds. Reader was all about the RSS. At this rate they are sounding like a tardy Prismatic.
Additionally, Digg - the product, like HN, Reddit etc was never going to be a substitute for Reader. The product they are currently working on sounds like a direct replacement for Reader with a social slant. Seems like the most sensible move for them to become relevant again.
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#25Um, there are a ton of Google Reader replacements out there doing incredibly well in the wake of that announcement. Digg deciding to create their own product from scratch seems very stupid.
There's definitely space here.
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#26Is there enough value in the Digg brand to justify using it here?
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#27Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#28If they can execute well quickly enough, I can foresee Digg coming out one of the top 5 reader apps soon.
Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#29Re: Digg says it’s serious about building a replacement for Google Reader
#30At least, they appear to have their priority straight. Keep it simple, we don't need no stinking share buttons. Make it fast - my connection is badly lagging these days and I can't do anything about it short of relocating, so this is close to my heart. Synchronize across device - basically, make mobile apps so that it's fast on mobile too.