Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
21–30 of 42 posts
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#22Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#23So if you're Al Queda, the play here seems obvious. Get as many sleeper agents in the U.S. as possible (which I'm sure they're constantly working on) and each day send a couple on a plane armed with an old thermometer. How many could you take down before people realized what was going on? And after they did, how much damage would it do to the economy when nobody flew anymore? I sure hope I'm missing some secret reaso…
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#24So if you're Al Queda, the play here seems obvious. Get as many sleeper agents in the U.S. as possible (which I'm sure they're constantly working on) and each day send a couple on a plane armed with an old thermometer. How many could you take down before people realized what was going on? And after they did, how much damage would it do to the economy when nobody flew anymore? I sure hope I'm missing some secret reaso…
I umm.. ehem.. went and maybe umm tired it a little bit after seeing this because it sounded so darn cool. The liquid mercury I've culled from old thermostats had no discernible effect.
Edit: I tried it on a piece of aluminum angle bar. I even tried filing it a little to rough it up. Nothing. Anyone else had any success?
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#25So if you're Al Queda, the play here seems obvious. Get as many sleeper agents in the U.S. as possible (which I'm sure they're constantly working on) and each day send a couple on a plane armed with an old thermometer. How many could you take down before people realized what was going on? And after they did, how much damage would it do to the economy when nobody flew anymore? I sure hope I'm missing some secret reaso…
I wonder if the mercury in the thermometer would set off the metal detector. It might be hard to get it past security.
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Note that the comment "debunking" the article is by the author of the article itself (or so he claims). The debunking seems to consist of repeating what is in the article: the FAA doesn't allow large amounts of mercury, as is present in a professional barometer. The scariness of the article seems to reside mostly in the comments here and choice of headline. (although the picture of the dissolving I-beam isn't particu…
Well the comment biohacker24 linked to wasn't really debunking it, but it was by the popsci author (supposedly). Both of these comments (in the same thread) do debunk it: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/85clw/why_mercury_i... http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/85clw/why_mercury_i...
Dear HN - I love youse guys.
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#27So, those old-style thermometers with mercury - even that much mercury could shred an airplane? I know knowledge is power and all that, but I almost wish I hadn't found out about this.
I doubt this would do serious harm to a plane before landing. I doubt if this would even matter in an unpressurized cargo hold because I was always told it evaporated quite quickly at low pressures.
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#28This is really scary stuff (and I was hoping that it would never make it on HN). I heard from an aeronautical engineer once that if one drop of mercury somehow gets let loose in an airplane that the whole plane needs to be basically taken apart (and possibly scrapped). Mercury by itself is very toxic. There was a custodian who broke a thermometer in our office building once. That would have been ok - had she not spre…
Whole building detoxification because of a single broken thermometer seems like overkill (unless it was some unusually big one). It's important to clean it properly (good ventilation, don't spread it around, don't vacuum clean), but unless you do something really stupid (that would get significant amount vaporized and inhaled), it should be ok. Perhaps the most important thing to remember if you break a household the…
IIRC I used a paper towel (whilst wearing rubber gloves, with the windows all open) to absorb the mercury and slid it into a plastic bottle and bagged it like 10 times before I went outside to make sure I wasn't exposed too long.
From my understanding they recommend all the precautions, not because like one drop will kill you, but because "it's better safe than sorry". You have an entire lifetime, just like you shouldn't be exposed to a huge dose of radiation, you shouldn't expose yourself to a huge dose of mercury, because fish contain mercury (and my lack of eating fish has likely balanced out any mercury I was actually ever exposed to) and if you eat tons of fish, sucking on broken thermometers and breaking florescent bulbs might just get enough mercury into you to make you nuts... although if you're purposefully exposing yourself to raw mercury to begin with I believe it's probably a moot point.
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#29This is really scary stuff (and I was hoping that it would never make it on HN). I heard from an aeronautical engineer once that if one drop of mercury somehow gets let loose in an airplane that the whole plane needs to be basically taken apart (and possibly scrapped). Mercury by itself is very toxic. There was a custodian who broke a thermometer in our office building once. That would have been ok - had she not spre…
Whole building detoxification because of a single broken thermometer seems like overkill (unless it was some unusually big one). It's important to clean it properly (good ventilation, don't spread it around, don't vacuum clean), but unless you do something really stupid (that would get significant amount vaporized and inhaled), it should be ok. Perhaps the most important thing to remember if you break a household the…
Re: Why mercury is forbidden aboard airplanes
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well the comment biohacker24 linked to wasn't really debunking it, but it was by the popsci author (supposedly). Both of these comments (in the same thread) do debunk it: http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/85clw/why_mercury_i... http://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/85clw/why_mercury_i...
Wow. That was my first Reddit experience in a long time - I appreciate the links, because I wouldn't have come close to trawling through the conversational inanities to find the nuggets of perception buried in a shit-storm of self-flagellation. Dear HN - I love youse guys.