"The Administration does not support blowing up planets." I guess we're going to have to wait until the Republicans are back in the executive branch.
This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
21–30 of 71 posts
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#22Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#23"The construction of the Death Star has been estimated to cost more than $850,000,000,000,000,000. We're working hard to reduce the deficit, not expand it." The White House blog doesn't link to the source article, so here it is: http://www.centives.net/S/2012/how-much-would-it-cost-to-bui...
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#24"The Administration does not support blowing up planets." I guess we're going to have to wait until the Republicans are back in the executive branch.
Sigh. I laughed at this, it's a fun and smart response targeted to a sub-community that barely broke the threshold to get that response.
But let's be real. If your standard of 'blowing up the planet' is somewhat lesser than 'the Republicans'...it might make you feel better to say it but history shows both of them are plenty happy dropping bombs for no justifiable reason.
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#25"The Administration does not support blowing up planets." I guess we're going to have to wait until the Republicans are back in the executive branch.
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#26Now that they write a joke response to a joke petition, it would be nice to see a serious response to a serious petition.
Is 96 the real number? Since the search bar always says 'featured responses'. When you click the bottom bar to see more responses it does some delayed-JS-scroll action and shows all of 8 more results.
Unless you're really trying to increase the drop-off rate on each click, why make it so crappy? How many sites set their pagination to 8 items, unless they want users to linger on what was just delivered?
They don't seem to be very serious about the petition site. Good PR, and I guess I'm glad they have the option, but it's kind of a joke.
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#27I can't tell you how happy it makes me to know our federal government has a sense of humor.
I think this is a great development. As a DC resident, I can attest to everyone here taking themselves far too seriously.
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#28Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#29"The Administration does not support blowing up planets." I guess we're going to have to wait until the Republicans are back in the executive branch.
"You've seen the action movies where the bad guy threatens to destroy the Earth. You've heard people on the news claiming that the next nuclear war or cutting down rainforests or persisting in releasing hideous quantities of pollution into the atmosphere threatens to end the world.
"Fools.
"The Earth is built to last. It is a 4,550,000,000-year-old, 5,973,600,000,000,000,000,000-tonne ball of iron. It has taken more devastating asteroid hits in its lifetime than you've had hot dinners, and lo, it still orbits merrily. So my first piece of advice to you, dear would-be Earth-destroyer, is: do NOT think this will be easy."
- Sam Hughes, "How to destroy the Earth" - http://qntm.org/destroy
Re: This Isn't the Petition Response You're Looking For
#30Just hilarious! May the Force be with you!
I think the Farce is strong in that one. Seriously though, all it takes is a bunch of Star Wars reference to garner a bunch of Likes? No wonder there are so many actors in politics.