>My position is it's totally coherent to say that "training" is analogous to "reading"
yeah I joke about chatting up my ai gf but there's not going to be any sex lol
>and inference is not analogous to "redistributing rips"
I think you made both points previously so duly noted, your explanations are lacking tho.
>and that it's a reasonable position for fair use law to operate that way.
I think you said this too in a way. Which is interesting in a coincidental sort of way, I like working with loops. But what I do when producing a loop based techno whatever is I like to progress it somehow. The same thing over and over well I guess thats a thing too which is interesting, if you downloaded a heavily looped song, you can compress it by repeating one bar programmatically, granted its pretty lossy. its sort of how much information per measure of time, I like to call it "rpms", like for instance the first measure has high rpm, but if you loop it, each subsequent measure "loses rpms" so to speak. This doesn't take into consideration "incoherent noise" obviously, I like to take it as one measure amongst many.
Your text compresses nicely with suprisingly little loss of information!
>I think this benefits society.
Heh trump thinks energy can be created from nothing.
I appreciate the chat, but while I get the point you're making, I can also appreciate you're not interested in mine which is fair. I post as sort of a hobby, and I think I've sort of thrashed out a blog post maybe here, so thats appreciated.