Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 39 posts

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#21

Post by gchamonlive »

mukundzha6 wrote: post #18
StableAlkyne wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm assuming it's vibe coded, but it's a code smell I've noticed is specific to vibe coded projects. AIs tend to have a debilitating phobia of any kind of exception. Claude especially will throw try/except and weird coersion everywhere in the code. This bites you because it hides legitimate errors, even when the program is in such an unrecoverable state that it doesn't make logical sense to continue. It becomes impos…

Bro. I didn't had money fo claude code to review my codebase so i build this. And you are saying that i use claude code or anyother tools fot this. NOT GONNA LIE. I FORMATTED THE CODE FROM AI TO BE BREAKPROOF SO IN SOME CASES IT MAY LOOK AI GENERATED BUT ITS MOSTLY MY CODE WITH SOME AI TWEAKS.NOTHING MORE.

Why are you yelling? Makes me think the flagged and dead post is deserving and I'm wasting my time defending your project here.

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#22

Post by gchamonlive »

StableAlkyne wrote: post #19
gchamonlive wrote: post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Are other things wrong? I'd be wary to shame people's work without doing legwork to getting evidence to support your claim, otherwise you risk passing as someone just seeking attention and upvotes, riding on the tides of HN anti-AI sentiment. Which is valid for vote farming just to be clear, I'd just respect you less if this was the case.

I mean, my original post is just asking why it's in there. Maybe I'm missing something, so I asked. That isn't "shaming" their work. > otherwise you risk passing as someone just seeking attention and upvotes This isn't Reddit.

And yet people exploit upvote-baits, so give me a break

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#23

Post by doc_ick »

mukundzzha wrote: post #3
xshahneil76 wrote: post #2

similary i also solved the local search for all AI IDE tools i used and built a proactive memory and its all local completely and rest encrypted. myinventory.site

what problem does it solves?

What problem does your solution solve that the others don’t?

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#25

Post by mukundzha6 »

doc_ick wrote: post #24

Thought this looked familiar. A repost likely by the same person. Og: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49219370 Especially with a few commits just renaming the project and removing the roadmap.

bro sorry if you felt inconvenience but i did it because my previous post from different account got flagged. so i just checked it by uploading whether it got post or not.it got somehow posted and it boomed so i was unable to delete it.

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#27

Post by mukundzha6 »

gchamonlive wrote: post #21
mukundzha6 wrote: post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bro. I didn't had money fo claude code to review my codebase so i build this. And you are saying that i use claude code or anyother tools fot this. NOT GONNA LIE. I FORMATTED THE CODE FROM AI TO BE BREAKPROOF SO IN SOME CASES IT MAY LOOK AI GENERATED BUT ITS MOSTLY MY CODE WITH SOME AI TWEAKS.NOTHING MORE.

Why are you yelling? Makes me think the flagged and dead post is deserving and I'm wasting my time defending your project here.

sorry bro. but i wasn't yelling at you. just saying to criticizers. sorry.

Re: Show HN: I canceled my AI code reviewer and wrote a free local one

#30

Post by mukundzha6 »

doc_ick wrote: post #20
mukundzha6 wrote: post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wanna make it standard for developers before making pre commit. We are local focused , no data stored of anyone and provide lightning fast analysis for now. Later we are gonna make ai integartion for better output. THANKS BUDDY FOR THAT FEEDBACK.

However other tools like gitlab sast, python black, and others have differential flags that only scan for changed files. Worst case on a precommit that can be wired to pass only git changed files to be reviewed. Not for criticism, but is this targeting that “air gapped” git diff scanning area?

[flagged]
Post reply on HN