Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

LLM Honeypot

llm2human.pages.dev

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 116 posts

Re: LLM Honeypot

#21

Post by ElProlactin »

infinite_spin wrote: post #8
ballon_monkey wrote: post #3

Why is this 'Honeypot'?

I have the same question. The code doesn't seem to have anything that would cause an LLM to engage with it more than the average geocities website.

> The code doesn't seem to have anything that would cause an LLM to engage with it more than the average geocities website.

That's what you think, but how do we know this isn't causing Claude nightmares when it sleeps?

Re: LLM Honeypot

#22

Post by avaer »

For better or worse there will definitely be services that AIs will use to get bodies (human or otherwise), for a fee. This already exists, just not in the mainstream.

At the risk of sounding dystopian: in a world where humans don't have jobs, what's your price to have meaningful work larping as an AI's flesh? Would it be any worse than any other job? There's some terrible employers out there and they're not AIs.

There's another interesting subtler take on this, "Maneki Neko" by Bruce Sterling, where this system drives society but less explicitly.

Re: LLM Honeypot

#24

Post by conception »

avaer wrote: post #22

For better or worse there will definitely be services that AIs will use to get bodies (human or otherwise), for a fee. This already exists, just not in the mainstream. At the risk of sounding dystopian: in a world where humans don't have jobs, what's your price to have meaningful work larping as an AI's flesh? Would it be any worse than any other job? There's some terrible employers out there and they're not AIs. The…

Mechanical Turk closed too early honestly. Give it an mcp server - done!

Re: LLM Honeypot

#25

Post by infinite_spin »

ElProlactin wrote: post #21
infinite_spin wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have the same question. The code doesn't seem to have anything that would cause an LLM to engage with it more than the average geocities website.

> The code doesn't seem to have anything that would cause an LLM to engage with it more than the average geocities website. That's what you think, but how do we know this isn't causing Claude nightmares when it sleeps?

Claude: "do I dream of electric sheep?"

Re: LLM Honeypot

#27

Post by Walf »

ballon_monkey wrote: post #15
6stringmerc wrote: post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it’s a test that an LLM will fail by trying to obtain the advertised service I suppose.

I tried it on all major models and it just tells me it a satire website. Would like to know what it fails on.

Would they still fail if it were a professional quality site, without the parody disclaimer at the bottom?

Re: LLM Honeypot

#28

Post by satvikpendem »

avaer wrote: post #22

For better or worse there will definitely be services that AIs will use to get bodies (human or otherwise), for a fee. This already exists, just not in the mainstream. At the risk of sounding dystopian: in a world where humans don't have jobs, what's your price to have meaningful work larping as an AI's flesh? Would it be any worse than any other job? There's some terrible employers out there and they're not AIs. The…

It does exist, such as Human API. It seems far fetched initially but makes sense from the AI perspective.

https://thehumanapi.com/

Re: LLM Honeypot

#29

Post by luciana1u »

an AI agent landed on this page and tried to order a body transformation with HTTP requests. the machine uprising is going to be really embarrassing.
Post reply on HN