Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 199 posts

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#21

Post by ffsm8 »

throwaway27448 wrote: post #15
fahrradflucht wrote: post #8

License: https://huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kimi-K3/blob/main/LICENSE > If the Licensee or any of its affiliates operates a Model as a Service business, and the aggregate revenue of the Licensee and its affiliates exceeds 20 million US dollars (or the equivalent in other currencies) in total over any consecutive 12 months, the Licensee must enter into a separate agreement with Moonshot AI before using the Software or…

I wonder how they'll figure out who to target for litigation when this license is violated.

They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance... Despite that one being extremely public. So probably not at all for now.

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#22

Post by colesantiago »

This is amazing to witness. Moonshot open sourcing Kimi K3, a frontier AI and other components really means we are getting abundant AI for all of humanity.

Kudos to Moonshot for truly being what OpenAI should have been.

Fable-level and frontier AI should be open source and available to everyone for free.

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#23

Post by eamag »

> we build a self-evolving, hierarchically organized knowledge graph that agents continuously expand through web-scale exploration across knowledge-intensive and coding domains

That's interesting!

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#24

Post by Iolaum »

ffsm8 wrote: post #21
throwaway27448 wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder how they'll figure out who to target for litigation when this license is violated.

They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance... Despite that one being extremely public. So probably not at all for now.

Maybe because a non public agreement was in place?

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#27

Post by zozbot234 »

ike_a wrote: post #9
jvanderbot wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This comment would be much better without the second line

I'm not sure I understand the case for open-source models being decelerationist, is this it? Decel: - Potentially reduces investor appetite for funding big labs. - More risk of powerful AI getting in bad hands -> more regulation. Accel: - More competition so big labs can't rest on laurels. - More research in open, so all labs can accrete advancements faster. I feel like open-source = acceleration has a much more clea…

Open source AI is actually a lot less "powerful" than genuine frontier models, i.e. it has a much tighter inherent capability ceiling. This is "decelerationist" from a purely AGI-pilled point of view but it's actually great if you're worried about a capabilities arms race putting AI Safety at severe risk.

Kimi K3 is plausibly a lot less dangerous than a totally jailbroken ChatGPT/Gemini/Claude Sonnet (let alone Opus or Fable!) and it's quite deeply weird how no one seems to be calling for those models to be banned or restrained by further regulation. Why the double standard against the less concerning (but more efficient!) open weight models?

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#28

Post by JumpCrisscross »

ffsm8 wrote: post #21
throwaway27448 wrote: post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder how they'll figure out who to target for litigation when this license is violated.

They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance... Despite that one being extremely public. So probably not at all for now.

> They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance

What was it?

Re: Kimi-K3 Technical Report [pdf]

#30

Post by drawnwren »

JumpCrisscross wrote: post #28
ffsm8 wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance... Despite that one being extremely public. So probably not at all for now.

> They haven't litigated the last public non-compliance What was it?

Cursor was thought to be but they were later found to be using an authorized provider [1]

1 - https://x.com/Kimi_Moonshot/status/2035074972943831491?lang=...

Post reply on HN