Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
21–30 of 65 posts
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#22I much prefer the interface of Pixelmator and Pages to Photoshop and InDesign, and paying once (for the non-AI-augmented version of Pixelmator, which Apple indicate will continue to receive some manner of updates going forward) is a nice plus. It’s unfortunate there’s not a real Illustrator equivalent; Pixelmator has okay enough vector editing and export support for my needs, but notably will render the canvas raster…
I can’t say that would’ve been a perfect outcome all things considered, but Apple certainly would’ve had a well rounded creative suite.
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#23Apple should buy Sketch
Sketch lost the market to Figma, and now Figma is losing the market to vibe coding. I'm not sure what the value proposition of Sketch is these days apart from local, non-cloud editing (although you can even get that with a pretty decent UI these days with Lunacy).
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#24Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sketch lost the market to Figma, and now Figma is losing the market to vibe coding. I'm not sure what the value proposition of Sketch is these days apart from local, non-cloud editing (although you can even get that with a pretty decent UI these days with Lunacy).
Doesn't Apple already have a loose competitor to Figma? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeform_%28Apple%29
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#26A single job posting for an engagement team doesn't really tell you if its a company strategy or not. Directors hire on random ideas all the time and then pivot as needed
>A single job posting for an engagement team A single job posting for an engagement team in Poland.
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
>A single job posting for an engagement team A single job posting for an engagement team in Poland.
A person from Poland here: why does the country matter here? What are the implications you're implying?
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
>A single job posting for an engagement team A single job posting for an engagement team in Poland.
A person from Poland here: why does the country matter here? What are the implications you're implying?
Just like Amazon posting for this position in Phoenix wouldn't be seen the same way as Seattle.
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
>A single job posting for an engagement team A single job posting for an engagement team in Poland.
A person from Poland here: why does the country matter here? What are the implications you're implying?
Re: Apple has decided to compete for creativity app users
#30There’s no escaping that whatever money Apple makes from this will be a rounding error compared to iPhone / iOS revenue. I honestly think the apps would be better served to be sold to a smaller company where such revenue was a bigger piece of their pie and they were therefore incentivized to care about them.
I can't even imagine what it would be like to work in an Apple-sized rounding error.