Frustratingly I couldn’t find a Mikrotik that would offer me a few SFPs, and a 2.5 or two. I wanted ideally just 3 SFPs - two WAN for LB / Failover and one up to switch. 2.5g WAN would do but would rather SFP for future use. UDM-SE it is for now.
HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
21–30 of 151 posts
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#22About 2 years ago I tried to use Mikrotik, as the router for my ATT Fiber. It's royal pain. Basic router setup is not hard. Port forward to expose web server? Can be done after heavy docs&forum reading, but hair pinning never worked for me. I checked their WiFi AP. It's UI is hard even for senior software engineer. In the end I got opnSense installed in VM on Proxmox and it's my router for last 2 years. I'm using 2 M…
It wasn’t terribly complicated for me but I seem to be built for the old Cisco style iOS. But with an LLM it’s easier than falling off a log and the command line means it can do everything easily.
I remember I misconfigured it, and can't really Google around or ask LLM to fix it, because my Internet is down now.
Of course I can use Internet on my phone, but it's not really convenient setup to ask LLM to troubleshoot the router.
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#23Is that representative of using mikrotik hardware?
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#24About 2 years ago I tried to use Mikrotik, as the router for my ATT Fiber. It's royal pain. Basic router setup is not hard. Port forward to expose web server? Can be done after heavy docs&forum reading, but hair pinning never worked for me. I checked their WiFi AP. It's UI is hard even for senior software engineer. In the end I got opnSense installed in VM on Proxmox and it's my router for last 2 years. I'm using 2 M…
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#25I can't read the nearly-white (or super-thin font) text on the white background. Is that representative of using mikrotik hardware?
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
It wasn’t terribly complicated for me but I seem to be built for the old Cisco style iOS. But with an LLM it’s easier than falling off a log and the command line means it can do everything easily.
The router probably should work without relying on LLM: I remember I misconfigured it, and can't really Google around or ask LLM to fix it, because my Internet is down now. Of course I can use Internet on my phone, but it's not really convenient setup to ask LLM to troubleshoot the router.
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#27For me, the era of MikroTik is sort of... now. Don't get me wrong, they make powerful and feature-complete stuff, but their UI sort of assumes you really know what you're doing. I don't know what I'm doing. But my LLM does. I've been able to set up site-to-site VPNs with Mikrotik in fifteen minutes now, rather than the day-long exercise of googling and praying.
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#28Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#29For me, the era of MikroTik is sort of... now. Don't get me wrong, they make powerful and feature-complete stuff, but their UI sort of assumes you really know what you're doing. I don't know what I'm doing. But my LLM does. I've been able to set up site-to-site VPNs with Mikrotik in fifteen minutes now, rather than the day-long exercise of googling and praying.
Re: HomeLab #1: MikroTik as a Home Router
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
LLMs certainly help out - in my case, agent helped with searching through various web forums about how my ISP authenticates and sets up Internet connection. Nevertheless let's give MikroTik, where it's due: * new documentation page is much cleaner to browse * tutorials on their YouTube channel are quite informative * WinBox v4 has in my opinion much more pleasent UX/UI than v3
I’m going to admit it took me too many years to realize there is a Mac Winbox client - I assumed it was a windows only thing.
It's possible to run v3 under Wine on a Mac but it was kind of clunky. V4 is much nicer (also runs on Linux too).