Live data from Hacker News

The Psychology of Software Teams

routledge.com

21–30 of 63 posts

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#21
The author Cat Hicks also co-hosts https://www.changetechnically.fyi/ which has some interesting episodes, e.g. https://www.changetechnically.fyi/2396236/episodes/17541876-...

In https://mastodon.social/@grimalkina/116743715688970777 she gives a concise explanation of the minimal groups paradigm where "People assigned to arbitrary groups immediately form strong allegiances, even though they haven’t been given any other psychologically meaningful cues about their group"

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#22

I really do not recommend to buy the ebook in this web shop. Its the worst UX I have ever seen in an online shop. Normally you would pay and then receive a link to download. Here it goes like this: - you receive an email: Please create an account on our website, you will benefit a lot from it - then another email: If you want to get the book you just payed for, you must register first and then enter this code: #20 di…

ouf :( maybe original link should be changed to https://www.drcathicks.com/ ?

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#23

I really do not recommend to buy the ebook in this web shop. Its the worst UX I have ever seen in an online shop. Normally you would pay and then receive a link to download. Here it goes like this: - you receive an email: Please create an account on our website, you will benefit a lot from it - then another email: If you want to get the book you just payed for, you must register first and then enter this code: #20 di…

libgen

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#24
post #8

I feel like there could be a lot of value in understanding the psychology of teams and using it to build an environment where they can thrive. However, every person I've worked with who was into these workplace-psychology books started thinking of themselves as expert diagnosticians of other people's psychology. Every personality or problem got mapped back to a scenario from a book they read, even when it wasn't a go…

I'd say it's a reflection of an earlier stage of interpersonal maturity to try and put people into categories. More socially attuned people realize the complexity of other people and situations and synthesize all the available information to make a decision that is truly reflective of reality.

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#25
post #24
post #8

I feel like there could be a lot of value in understanding the psychology of teams and using it to build an environment where they can thrive. However, every person I've worked with who was into these workplace-psychology books started thinking of themselves as expert diagnosticians of other people's psychology. Every personality or problem got mapped back to a scenario from a book they read, even when it wasn't a go…

I'd say it's a reflection of an earlier stage of interpersonal maturity to try and put people into categories. More socially attuned people realize the complexity of other people and situations and synthesize all the available information to make a decision that is truly reflective of reality.

You must have read Changing on the job :p

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#28
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am very curious: did you figure some of the books they were using?

That's a good question. Some of the perspectives in the book can be helpful. The limitation is that the scenarios and themes in the books are always a little too perfect to reflect real life. Like you're watching a movie and everything is going disastrously wrong, then the hero shows up and the tone completely changes for the better. Everything starts going right. The most valuable parts are probably reframing the si…

"You are a stream-aligned team"

Re: The Psychology of Software Teams

#29
post #8

I feel like there could be a lot of value in understanding the psychology of teams and using it to build an environment where they can thrive. However, every person I've worked with who was into these workplace-psychology books started thinking of themselves as expert diagnosticians of other people's psychology. Every personality or problem got mapped back to a scenario from a book they read, even when it wasn't a go…

Doesn't that happen with any first-year psychology or med-student, too? You have some basic knowledge of what could happen, which therefore means that it does happen, right now, here. It normally goes away with more experience and exposure, and yeah, some personal growth.
Post reply on HN