The feature is great. The post itself is a slop grenade.
Can you elaborate? I read it, found the concepts well explained, walked away better informed. Responding to alleged slop with more slop doesn’t decrease the total amount of slop on the internet.
Workers Cache
21–30 of 87 posts
Re: Workers Cache
#22now, waiting for opennext adapter maintainers to catchup with it
it already uses Workers Cache for the route-level ISR cache
Re: Workers Cache
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Fuck, I spent all these years developing a thoughtful writing style that leaned toward clarity for the reader, even if it meant extra work to achieve precision, or adding affordances like “excessive” hyphenation, and now I guess have to learn to write worse.
There is a world of difference between well-written human text and sloppy walls of AI-generated text. There's nothing wrong in using hyphenations or emdashes -- I use them myself! That's not the point of my comment.
Re: Workers Cache
#24A big worry was always "why does workers sit in front of my cache? that's a waste of an invocation if i'm returning a cached result"
Re: Workers Cache
#25curious, how does one configure something like this for AWS Lambda? Appreciate it. I am assuming it is a bunch of manual work.
Re: Workers Cache
#26curious, how does one configure something like this for AWS Lambda? Appreciate it. I am assuming it is a bunch of manual work.
Re: Workers Cache
#27The feature is great. The post itself is a slop grenade.
One of the recent AI tells other than em dash is the excessive usage of hyphenated words: > multi-tenant-safe cache keys > on a server-rendered app > byte-for-byte identical (classic) > gets a cache-speed response > cached-file-extensions list Honestly, this is terrible. I had to add a "use simple words only, don't hyphenate unnecessarily" warning to my Claude config. After a full day of work, having to read these Cl…
Re: Workers Cache
#28On top of that the cache tags are a slick way to do invalidation. This looks like a great product.
Re: Workers Cache
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Can you elaborate? I read it, found the concepts well explained, walked away better informed. Responding to alleged slop with more slop doesn’t decrease the total amount of slop on the internet.
Not the original commenter; but, at least for me, the idea is that when it’s written by humans we know that effort and care were put into communicating the news. Otherwise they could post a link to the docs and we could ask my flavor of LLM to summerize. No need for extra filler content. That why it’s slop and it’s different.
Why are we all of a sudden pretending like pre-LLM era blogs were these pristinely well written pieces of art or even that effort and care was put into them? In most cases they were significantly less coherent and incomplete. Don’t get me started on the mess that was the communication of this particular company or one of their competitors like AWS.