Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Design System Prompt

github.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

21–30 of 35 posts

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#21

Post by robkop »

simonw wrote: post #9

I can't even tell if this repository is based on prompts extracted from Claude Design or if the author had an LLM create all of these prompts in it from scratch. The fact that they encourage and accept PRs indicates that this isn't intended as a direct prompt extraction exposure project - plus the license, which should indicate they have the authorship necessary to license that content. Assuming this IS a complete gr…

Claude design's prompt is trivial to verify. They bundle it in the frontend bundle and send it on every network request.

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#23

Post by PepegaRoach »

simonw wrote: post #9

I can't even tell if this repository is based on prompts extracted from Claude Design or if the author had an LLM create all of these prompts in it from scratch. The fact that they encourage and accept PRs indicates that this isn't intended as a direct prompt extraction exposure project - plus the license, which should indicate they have the authorship necessary to license that content. Assuming this IS a complete gr…

[dead]

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#24

Post by smokel »

throwaway7356 wrote: post #20
smokel wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If this is regular output of the LLM, I'm not sure, but given that the author proclaims that this is reverse engineered, then they are not allowed to redistribute it under their own license terms. The terms of service are also pretty clear on this not being allowed, which makes it extra hard to defend (section 3.3): > You may not access or use, or help another person to access or use, our Services in the following wa…

The terms of service are between Anthropic and one of their subscribers. So Anthropic can maybe cancel their contract. This doesn't affect what copyright law allows or does not allow. Also I think Anthropic very much suppports gathering data by whatever means possible. That should work both ways.

It does make a difference. If this text was generated by the LLM, then by those same terms you are allowed to publish the data. But given that it is reverse engineered, you are not allowed to do so.

Note that even in the normal case, there are restrictions. You'd have to validate that the generated output is not copyrighted. Which in this case may not be trivial.

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#26

Post by smokel »

dahart wrote: post #25
smokel wrote: post #7

> Open source, MIT licensed. I don't think that is how copyright licensing works.

What do you mean? https://opensource.org/license/mit

You cannot claim authorship of something that you were not even allowed to take in the first place. How would you then allow rights to somebody else?

Seems pretty obvious to me.

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#27

Post by dahart »

smokel wrote: post #26
dahart wrote: post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you mean? https://opensource.org/license/mit

You cannot claim authorship of something that you were not even allowed to take in the first place. How would you then allow rights to somebody else? Seems pretty obvious to me.

Oh you’re assuming the content in this repo is taken from somewhere? There are other sibling threads about this; you might be mis-interpreting the title.

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#28

Post by smokel »

dahart wrote: post #27
smokel wrote: post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You cannot claim authorship of something that you were not even allowed to take in the first place. How would you then allow rights to somebody else? Seems pretty obvious to me.

Oh you’re assuming the content in this repo is taken from somewhere? There are other sibling threads about this; you might be mis-interpreting the title.

The GitHub page clearly states that it is reverse engineered.

Even if you rewrite an article in your own words, you cannot claim copyright for that. At least, not to my knowledge.

Re: Claude Design System Prompt

#29

Post by dahart »

smokel wrote: post #28
dahart wrote: post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh you’re assuming the content in this repo is taken from somewhere? There are other sibling threads about this; you might be mis-interpreting the title.

The GitHub page clearly states that it is reverse engineered. Even if you rewrite an article in your own words, you cannot claim copyright for that. At least, not to my knowledge.

Oh you’re right, sorry! Well unless the Claude Design prompt is open source licensed, then correct, it’s not legal to publish it under an open license. That would be a copyright violation.
Post reply on HN