Earlier quoted context omitted.
Browsers have been doing this well for over a decade and have tons of superiority. My favourite that kinda settles this debate is - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48168058
Browsers have been able to do this, but clear note: a single browser displaying many web pages in tabs. Think of how most any modern computer would grind to a halt if every tab was its own full-fat web browser. And THAT is the problem with Electron. It’s not one installed framework providing the foundation for whatever number of apps you want to use, it’s a single electron framework for each and every app . And that…
Claude's Criminally Bad Electron Mac App Is an Inside Job
21–24 of 24 posts
Re: Claude's Criminally Bad Electron Mac App Is an Inside Job
#22Re: Claude's Criminally Bad Electron Mac App Is an Inside Job
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nope, it really is not.
I didn't think it was so bad either. I guess it is all a matter of perspective.
The big advantage of Electron is that it takes so much less effort to write an application and bring it to all operating systems. Thus, we get applications that would not have been developed if Electron did not exist.
Re: Claude's Criminally Bad Electron Mac App Is an Inside Job
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
I didn't think it was so bad either. I guess it is all a matter of perspective.
Electron maintainer here. Electron is performant if the app developer writes good code. It's slow if someone writes bad code. That's the same if you use Apple's native APIs. The big advantage of Electron is that it takes so much less effort to write an application and bring it to all operating systems. Thus, we get applications that would not have been developed if Electron did not exist.