Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
21–30 of 97 posts
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#22More often than not, money is never truly lost; it is just passed from one person's hand to another. I believe that with the help of the big tech companies, governments have found faster and better ways to move money from the hands of the many with little into the hands of the few with a lot. The layoffs are an example of this as coders, assitance and other white-collar workers are replaced by AI for low prices so as…
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#23Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#24Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#25Really, I knew that AI had some risks, I just couldn't foresee this one.
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#26Innovation has pretty much always heightened the wealth disparity between the wealthy and the poor. A classical example would be the Industrial Revolution and America's guilded age, and another could be the circular investments between modern AI corpos (the whole nVIDIA, Microsoft, and OpenAI funding loop), which is probably a bad thing in the long run (systemic violence and class revolt). We have to walk this tightr…
Why do we need constant innovation?
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Why do we need constant innovation? Because, for example, no parents should lose their kids to leukemia. At 17 y/o I was save from peritonitis / sepsis first misdiagnosed as harmless belly pain and hidden by painkillers. Then it became a matter of hours and from the moment the doctor saw me again and I undergo surgical operation, less than two hours happened. My father got diagnosed a stage 3 bladder cancer with me…
> And, no, science ain't a bag out of which you pick what suits you (medicine) and leave out what you don't like (the Internet / LLMs / etc.). Uhhhh. Sure it is. We stopped nuclear weapons development. At best, rogue countries can catch up to where we are but there's no political will to build even bigger or more powerful bombs anymore. Thats an entire branch of science that we've literally cut off on a worldwide bas…
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#28Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do we need constant innovation?
> Why do we need constant innovation? Because, for example, no parents should lose their kids to leukemia. At 17 y/o I was save from peritonitis / sepsis first misdiagnosed as harmless belly pain and hidden by painkillers. Then it became a matter of hours and from the moment the doctor saw me again and I undergo surgical operation, less than two hours happened. My father got diagnosed a stage 3 bladder cancer with me…
Re: Everyone feared AI taking over; the real danger is AI serving just the few
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And, no, science ain't a bag out of which you pick what suits you (medicine) and leave out what you don't like (the Internet / LLMs / etc.). Uhhhh. Sure it is. We stopped nuclear weapons development. At best, rogue countries can catch up to where we are but there's no political will to build even bigger or more powerful bombs anymore. Thats an entire branch of science that we've literally cut off on a worldwide bas…
Nuclear weapons development hasn't stopped outside of US. Maybe you mean it hasn't spread to any new countries lately... which is true but I wouldn't count on that lasting.
The USSR wanted to make sure they were the ones who built the largest bomb of all time (the Tsar Bomba at 50 MTon). And after that, development on more ferocious weapons has stopped.