Live data from Hacker News

AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 52 posts

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#21
post #15

Simple. I use my brain and write code without coding agents.

Tough to do this when the rest of the company is using LLMs to generate 3x the number of apps and then your performance goes down because you're not delivering as quickly as others

Doesn't matter if they're generating 3x the number of apps if they're all shite and unmaintainable

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#22
I use AI for Kubernetes. On a day-to-day basis, it runs 80%+ of my kubectl commands. It’s the most steroidal auto-complete I’ve tried. But I do get dumber for it.

What I do to compensate:

  - make it my duty to own every change, i.e. cognitively debt-free:
  - write summaries on every new thing I do (blog post, memo to colleague)
  - contribute documentation to the open-source projects I rely on
  - practice for CKA/CKAD certificates which require pre-LLM muscle memory
  - build interactive learning material for what I’m trying to learn
  - work with things that LLMs don’t yet trivially solve
  - repeat or reconstruct my recipes to perfect workflows, 
We’re incentivised to take the short path. I’m trying to create at least one path through a subject that I have to walk myself, preferably several times.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#23

For every skill that may atrophy, I feel like I am developing experience in 10 new ones. I am not focused on using AI to perform my existing job function though, I am developing new capabilities.

prompting is not a skill. prompt engineering, harness engineering watever are copes.

I once to believed this too. And then I got much more skilled at prompting agents to get the results I wanted.

As someone who is and always has been a very unapologetic skeptic, I am still surprised by the number of capable people who can't accept that things are changing.

It can't be either none of it matters, or all of it matters. The truth lies in the middle somewhere.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#24
I find it inefficient to use models for all possible uses right now even with the current subsidies. As the costs increase this will only become more true. Keeping that in mind will naturally motivate you to not lose your skills by engaging in inefficient token burn.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#25
post #15

Simple. I use my brain and write code without coding agents.

Tough to do this when the rest of the company is using LLMs to generate 3x the number of apps and then your performance goes down because you're not delivering as quickly as others

It's not tough if you do your job and your management has no issues with you. What others are doing doesn't affect your performance.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#26
post #2

Architecture decisions, requirements analysis, trade-offs in technology selection, and cross-system debugging—these high-level cognitive activities cannot yet be replaced by AI. Focusing on these areas is actually a smarter skill investment.

They can be easily replaced. I suspect we are just engaging in a form of self deception by thinking these choices we make are more than arbitrary decisions driven by nothing but our taste...

Often times I find agreeing to the stack the model suggests is the right option. It’s probably most trained on that.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#27

For every skill that may atrophy, I feel like I am developing experience in 10 new ones. I am not focused on using AI to perform my existing job function though, I am developing new capabilities.

prompting is not a skill. prompt engineering, harness engineering watever are copes.

It's less prompt engineering, and more breaking down work into chunks an llm can do. With more powerful models you can do more autonomously, and with dumber ones, you have to step in and do work more often.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#28
post #17

I am curious how the workflow of people, who do not write code at all, looks like, or what products do they build. In my experience LLMs are an excavator, but you still have to tweak the fine details with a shovel.

You break down tasks until the LLM can do it. The scale you work at depends on the reasoning skill of the LLM.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#29

For every skill that may atrophy, I feel like I am developing experience in 10 new ones. I am not focused on using AI to perform my existing job function though, I am developing new capabilities.

prompting is not a skill. prompt engineering, harness engineering watever are copes.

Prompt engineering is a skill insofar as technical communication is a skill. If you don't value this then I don't know what to tell you. It's not hard, but it's important.

Harness engineering is a skill insofar as it's not a trivial engineering problem. It's not super hard to get a simple one running, but an effective one can be quite in depth.

Re: AskHN:How do you handle skill atrophy from using coding agents?

#30

For every skill that may atrophy, I feel like I am developing experience in 10 new ones. I am not focused on using AI to perform my existing job function though, I am developing new capabilities.

prompting is not a skill. prompt engineering, harness engineering watever are copes.

A very intentional line in my CLAUDE/AGENTS is to act as the Principle Engineer and to explain architectural decisions along the way. I'm not about blindly generating the outcome. I'm reviewing decisions, asking deep questions, performing research and basically taking a college-level course in a specific topic with every big project I deliver.
Post reply on HN