Which category does this fall into?:
- Fraud
- Incompetence / misunderstanding that wasn't cleared up prior to publishing an article
- Neither; this works as expected21–30 of 106 posts
Which category does this fall into?:
- Fraud
- Incompetence / misunderstanding that wasn't cleared up prior to publishing an article
- Neither; this works as expecteddepending on actual conditions you are in, it could potentially double (or more) the time before you die of thirst if it was your only source of water.
Nearly all passive water-from-air devices described in articles are based on false claims. Peltier-based, desiccant/absorption/adsorption based, etc. All end up not working, or not existing. This has been common for ~10 years. Which category does this fall into?: - Fraud - Incompetence / misunderstanding that wasn't cleared up prior to publishing an article - Neither; this works as expected
https://news.mit.edu/2025/window-sized-device-taps-air-safe-...
So my vote is for working as expected.
Vaporware has never tasted so good or been so refreshing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
So a dehumidifier with extra steps.
"extra steps" meaning wearable dehumidifier. Are there other wearable dehumidifiers to produce drinking water? I don't think so. A reductive assessment (to a specific feature) of a novel idea, does not make it less interesting.
Then again, why would you want to wear your dehumidifier (ok ok water harvester)? Is it for excursions into damp areas, so that you can then return to your dry home to extract water?
Then, I believe everything in this video still applies.
Nearly all passive water-from-air devices described in articles are based on false claims. Peltier-based, desiccant/absorption/adsorption based, etc. All end up not working, or not existing. This has been common for ~10 years. Which category does this fall into?: - Fraud - Incompetence / misunderstanding that wasn't cleared up prior to publishing an article - Neither; this works as expected
The design seems reasonable. It seems like a scaled down version of this MIT one that uses similar principles: https://news.mit.edu/2025/window-sized-device-taps-air-safe-... So my vote is for working as expected.
Makes sense since we're speedrunning the other parts of the Butlerian jihad
I don't know about the rest of you, but if somebody spots Shai-hulud out in the Sahara I'm outta here.
Oh I'm a leavin' on a Shai-hulud
Don't know when I'll be back again..