Live data from Hacker News

two strangers. one call. no names

just2voices.com

21–30 of 30 posts

Re: two strangers. one call. no names

#21
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please don't use an LLM for the comments too

Well can't you at least appreciate how it's all in this cool and down-to-earth lowercase? Clearly there was a stylistic effort.

yes. lowercase has been my preference for several years now. interestingly enough i use to omit periods but i'm not extremely keen on them.

Re: two strangers. one call. no names

#22

Super neat concept, sort of like a stripped down chatroulette. However, in today's age I have to say that these sorts of little fun social experiment projects are just a lot harder to engage with without the back of your head going: "I wonder if this has some data collection, or voiceprint collection mechanism behind it". I'm not saying it does. In fact my natural assumption would be that it doesn't. But I can't be s…

who is the developer?

Re: two strangers. one call. no names

#28
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So what exactly did you mean by "llm?"?

what exactly did you mean by "Please don't use an LLM for the comments too"?

The subtext is, I can tell you used an LLM to write it. You understood what I meant perfectly well, and then pretended not to know what an LLM was.

Re: two strangers. one call. no names

#29
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Super neat concept, sort of like a stripped down chatroulette." Actually.. if you were around in the 80s, then you know that this isn't new, and not really a great concept. https://medium.com/timeline/party-lines-teens-a1be20c45686

Well, there's been other formats over the years. https://www.swedentips.se/the-swedish-number/

That was the point of my comment actually... the Sweden Tips hotline is interesting though. Imagine all the random weird calls the volunteers will get (and need subsequent counseling for).

Re: two strangers. one call. no names

#30
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what exactly did you mean by "Please don't use an LLM for the comments too"?

The subtext is, I can tell you used an LLM to write it. You understood what I meant perfectly well, and then pretended not to know what an LLM was.

how can you tell? was i pretending not to know what an llm was or was i just asking what you mean by llm in your comment?
Post reply on HN