Datacenters need cheap energy, something no region in Europe is having in abundance (except maybe Norway, Sweden, and Finland). I don't think Lombardy was seeing too much DC construction. It's just typical green politics. Forever backwards. Sure, people feel somewhat AI-fatigued, but blocking the future won't play out nicely for Italy or Europe in general.
Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
21–30 of 212 posts
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#22[flagged]
Yeah agriculture is bad for the environment, but at least it feeds us to keep us alive, so we can say it's worth it. Datacenters don't. They don't even create that many jobs like a factory for instance so we can say the mass employment offsets the environmental damage.
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#23[flagged]
Yeah, but they do produce food which data centers do not. This is an odd argument to make.
Data centers are not displacing food. That argument is disingenuous. Even in Italy agricultural land goes unused because of low demand.
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#24> built in green/agricultural areas So they want them in other areas instead? Like next to residential area? I'm not sure they understand the implications...
It's even in bold "the use of disused former industrial areas"
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#25[flagged]
Why would they ban productive uses of land?
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#26> built in green/agricultural areas So they want them in other areas instead? Like next to residential area? I'm not sure they understand the implications...
or... industrial areas?
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#27[flagged]
Yeah agriculture is bad for the environment, but at least it feeds us to keep us alive, so we can say it's worth it. Datacenters don't. They don't even create that many jobs like a factory for instance so we can say the mass employment offsets the environmental damage.
We have vastly more arable land than is needed to keep people from starving, even when used inefficiently to produce things like cattle feed.
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#28Cryptocurrencies never needed so much data centers as there are many alternatives to the worst one (Bitcoin) that improved their performance and there are environmentally friendly alternatives. LLMs on the other hand have an insatiable requirement for trillions of dollars of data centers, causing memory prices to skyrocket, companies to layoff staff to increase capital expenditure on even more data centers instead of…
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#29Datacenters need cheap energy, something no region in Europe is having in abundance (except maybe Norway, Sweden, and Finland). I don't think Lombardy was seeing too much DC construction. It's just typical green politics. Forever backwards. Sure, people feel somewhat AI-fatigued, but blocking the future won't play out nicely for Italy or Europe in general.
Maybe find scalable alternatives or software optimizations that do not require the worlds energy or building even more data centers everywhere and further burning up the planet?
Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas
#30[flagged]