Live data from Hacker News

Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

en.ilsole24ore.com

21–30 of 212 posts

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#21

Datacenters need cheap energy, something no region in Europe is having in abundance (except maybe Norway, Sweden, and Finland). I don't think Lombardy was seeing too much DC construction. It's just typical green politics. Forever backwards. Sure, people feel somewhat AI-fatigued, but blocking the future won't play out nicely for Italy or Europe in general.

[flagged]

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#22
post #3

[flagged]

Yeah agriculture is bad for the environment, but at least it feeds us to keep us alive, so we can say it's worth it. Datacenters don't. They don't even create that many jobs like a factory for instance so we can say the mass employment offsets the environmental damage.

Please at least pretend to read the article before posting something like that.

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#23
post #3

[flagged]

Yeah, but they do produce food which data centers do not. This is an odd argument to make.

We already produce far more food than we need. The amount of land in the US used for corn ethanol production alone is the size of a medium European country.

Data centers are not displacing food. That argument is disingenuous. Even in Italy agricultural land goes unused because of low demand.

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#24
post #20

> built in green/agricultural areas So they want them in other areas instead? Like next to residential area? I'm not sure they understand the implications...

Just had to read few more paragraphs : "the use of disused former industrial areas is favoured. In this case there are no additional burdens, but rather the law proposes bureaucratic simplifications."

It's even in bold "the use of disused former industrial areas"

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#26
post #20

> built in green/agricultural areas So they want them in other areas instead? Like next to residential area? I'm not sure they understand the implications...

>Like next to residential area?

or... industrial areas?

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#27
post #3

[flagged]

Yeah agriculture is bad for the environment, but at least it feeds us to keep us alive, so we can say it's worth it. Datacenters don't. They don't even create that many jobs like a factory for instance so we can say the mass employment offsets the environmental damage.

Tens of millions of acres of agricultural land goes to things like production of corn ethanol. It is disingenuous to pretend we need this land to feed anybody.

We have vastly more arable land than is needed to keep people from starving, even when used inefficiently to produce things like cattle feed.

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#28
post #11

Cryptocurrencies never needed so much data centers as there are many alternatives to the worst one (Bitcoin) that improved their performance and there are environmentally friendly alternatives. LLMs on the other hand have an insatiable requirement for trillions of dollars of data centers, causing memory prices to skyrocket, companies to layoff staff to increase capital expenditure on even more data centers instead of…

Is it inherent to the architecture of LLMs/GenAI or rather is it because VCs fund what they can capture and others can't fund?

Re: Lombardy increases charges for the construction of data centres in green areas

#29

Datacenters need cheap energy, something no region in Europe is having in abundance (except maybe Norway, Sweden, and Finland). I don't think Lombardy was seeing too much DC construction. It's just typical green politics. Forever backwards. Sure, people feel somewhat AI-fatigued, but blocking the future won't play out nicely for Italy or Europe in general.

> But blocking the future won't play out nicely for Italy or Europe in general.

Maybe find scalable alternatives or software optimizations that do not require the worlds energy or building even more data centers everywhere and further burning up the planet?

Post reply on HN