Live data from Hacker News

The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

scienceaim.com

21–30 of 268 posts

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#21
post #11

Australia also has a 60 year productivity low and a government that is boosting taxes on capital gains on shares/business to basically a worldwide high. So take our experiments with a grain of salt!

So you're saying that four-day-workweek companies saw no decline in their productivity, in contrast to the Australian average productivity which went down overall‽

That means the four-day-workweek is even better than we thought it was!

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#22
post #16
post #3

Papers like this should be called opinion surveys. Calling it a study is a disservice to science. As Feynman said, anything where they have to put science as a suffix is usually not science.

Edit: It’s becoming ever more increasingly common on HN to get downvotes for innocuous respectful posts. If you’re downvoting, I’d genuinely appreciate if you explained what is it that you find offensive about this post. You’re not going to hurt my feelings, I sincerely want to understand what it is that you see as transgressive so I can learn from it. Thank you. Another example which baffled me: https://news.ycombin…

[flagged]

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#23

Speaking as an American, I don’t give a shit if it increases productivity or not. Productivity has gone up exponentially with technological advancement since the advent of the 5 day work week. We, as a species, should be minimizing work to 3 or 4 days a week with equal overall pay. Corporations should be fined heavily for contacting an employee after working hours. On call should require corporations to pay hefty ove…

That would be ok in a non-globalized world. In our world, any country that implements those laws will see a lot more offshoring.

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#24
post #2

Basically every study shows a four day week works best. The issue is why we never go with what the study shows.

Because if we did we’d have universal healthcare, 4 day work weeks, WFH where possible, walkable cities, and a lot more housing, and every single one of those things makes it harder for abusive jobs to control their employees.

> universal healthcare, 4 day work weeks, WFH where possible, walkable cities, and a lot more housing

My my, seems like we gots ourselves a socialist o’er here. We don’t take kindly to your kind ’round these parts. What’s yer idea? Improve folks lives? Treat others with respect and dignity and give e’ryone meaning? Are ya cuckoo in tha head? Git him, boys.

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#25
post #19
post #2

Basically every study shows a four day week works best. The issue is why we never go with what the study shows.

Naive question but if it works best wouldn't companies that have a four day work week outperform theirs peers and because of that grow faster, and become more common? I see the opposite in most startups that have a 6 day work week to get ahead of the "slowly moving" 5 day work week competition.

In what metric do they get ahead? I think this is the key. What many visualise as getting ahead primarily seems to be fund raising or having a higher monetary value. Especially in startups where the largest mouth, the biggest blagger, or the quickest to mention a buzz word gets you more funding. Being closer to your end goal, with an adoptable product that improves society, is really the only metric that matters.

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#26
post #11

Australia also has a 60 year productivity low and a government that is boosting taxes on capital gains on shares/business to basically a worldwide high. So take our experiments with a grain of salt!

So you're saying that four-day-workweek companies saw no decline in their productivity, in contrast to the Australian average productivity which went down overall‽ That means the four-day-workweek is even better than we thought it was!

As an Australian, I am not sure that most work done in this country adds to productivity

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#28

Speaking as an American, I don’t give a shit if it increases productivity or not. Productivity has gone up exponentially with technological advancement since the advent of the 5 day work week. We, as a species, should be minimizing work to 3 or 4 days a week with equal overall pay. Corporations should be fined heavily for contacting an employee after working hours. On call should require corporations to pay hefty ove…

Do workers really care about productivity? As long as I get paid that's what matters.

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#29

Speaking as an American, I don’t give a shit if it increases productivity or not. Productivity has gone up exponentially with technological advancement since the advent of the 5 day work week. We, as a species, should be minimizing work to 3 or 4 days a week with equal overall pay. Corporations should be fined heavily for contacting an employee after working hours. On call should require corporations to pay hefty ove…

That would be ok in a non-globalized world. In our world, any country that implements those laws will see a lot more offshoring.

[deleted]

Re: The four-day workweek in Australia: insights from early adopters of 100:80:100

#30
post #2

Basically every study shows a four day week works best. The issue is why we never go with what the study shows.

"study"... The replication crises in science has shown that most studies are total bs. So we probably don't want to go with them.

How does that differentiate from a boss or a company philosophy stating a 5 or 6 day week is better? With no reliable metric on better, other than ancedotal evidence. It's not as if it's repeatable experimentation.
Post reply on HN