The website looked as any LLM ("AI") generated one, usually via Claude, considering the design that model frequently uses. And it is (300,755++ lines from Claude): https://github.com/CraigVG/roman-letters-network Here, I am sorry, but I just cannot consider it serious nor accountable, since I just cannot trust its data. If all the information there is valid and verified, every single letter and the authors' word afte…
Overall, I completely agree with your criticisms about the LLM nature of this. Yes, the project is completely coded by Claude. It's a side project that I threw together based on my love of history. I'm not an academic nor a researcher, but I do want to provide value for those who have a hobbyist-level interest in Roman history. If the project can reach the quality level required for real scholarship, I'd like to achieve that. If not, I want to be clear that it's not at that level.
On that note, I have tried to include original sources wherever possible. Wherever an LLM does translation, it is noted in the user interface, as you also quoted from my methodology.
Thanks again, and if you have any direct feedback or changes you'd like to see, I would love to hear it.