Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe just before that, when they started wearing digital watches.
The first digital watch was from 1972.
A treasure trove of fossils rewrites the story of early life
21–25 of 25 posts
Re: A treasure trove of fossils rewrites the story of early life
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or maybe just before that, when they started wearing digital watches.
The first digital watch was from 1972.
“Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a pretty neat idea.”
― Douglas Adams, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy
Re: A treasure trove of fossils rewrites the story of early life
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
The first digital watch was from 1972.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/54481-far-out-in-the-unchar... “Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a…
Re: A treasure trove of fossils rewrites the story of early life
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/54481-far-out-in-the-unchar... “Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small unregarded yellow sun. Orbiting this at a distance of roughly ninety-two million miles is an utterly insignificant little blue green planet whose ape-descended life forms are so amazingly primitive that they still think digital watches are a…
Yes. That.
Re: A treasure trove of fossils rewrites the story of early life
#25What a treasure indeed! I just didn‘t understand why this particular site had so well-preserved soft tissue fossils? I assume it is probably related to the geology of the site during formation of the fossils, and probably the researchers themselves are not quite sure. But I would love to know more, if anyone here understands about this sort of thing.
If I had to guess, they probably have some ideas. In Your inner fish (an excellent book, BTW) Neil Shubin has an afterword where he describes roughly how they went about deciding where to look for Tiktaalik. Basically, you start with whatever thing you want to find out more about; in the case of Tiktaalik, the transition of tetrapods from aquatic to terrestrial living. So you start by finding out where you have expos…