Live data from Hacker News

U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

getdatingphotos.com

21–28 of 28 posts

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#21
post #7

As a single woman still barely holding onto this age bracket (praying to the power of anonymity right now), the fact that this exists and is so clearly targeted at men who honestly look fine for such a high price is sad. If you told me you spent this much money on your profile to meet me, I would immediately subtract whatever smart and attractive points I unconsciously added to you and add them to your insecurity sco…

It doesn't matter if you think it's weird; it works. I did the same process manually many years ago, with Photofeeler and statistics research, and it made an obvious difference. I am now married. Men don't really care if something is considered weird by random female commenters if it is getting them frequently laid and into romances. As they say, don't ask a fish how to fish.

This reads like it was written by a Ferengi

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#22
post #17
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Notably none of these matter on dating apps where profile pics actually help you get matches so you can actually talk to a person.

You don't take photos on trips or with dogs?

I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#23
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Notably none of these matter on dating apps where profile pics actually help you get matches so you can actually talk to a person.

My man for two thousand dollars you could get a picture of yourself holding your Bichon Frisé at Livraria Lello

I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#24
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

My man for two thousand dollars you could get a picture of yourself holding your Bichon Frisé at Livraria Lello

I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.

Yes. You should not get a dog if you don’t want a dog. It is a broad example because it is common for people to enjoy having a dog.

It would not be weird though, for example, to visit The House on the Rock and take pictures while you’re there.

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It doesn't matter if you think it's weird; it works. I did the same process manually many years ago, with Photofeeler and statistics research, and it made an obvious difference. I am now married. Men don't really care if something is considered weird by random female commenters if it is getting them frequently laid and into romances. As they say, don't ask a fish how to fish.

This reads like it was written by a Ferengi

We don't like to make substanceless quips here. Please save them for reddit.

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#27
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.

Yes. You should not get a dog if you don’t want a dog. It is a broad example because it is common for people to enjoy having a dog. It would not be weird though, for example, to visit The House on the Rock and take pictures while you’re there.

But the point is that taking bad pictures doesn't help.

Re: U.S. gender ratios by metro, ages 20-34

#28
post #22
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't take photos on trips or with dogs?

I don't have a dog and it would be very weird to get a dog for the sole purpose of having one for dating profile pics to meet women.

The idea was getting a dog to improve your life, but agreed. That would be quite weird.
Post reply on HN