I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
21–30 of 171 posts
Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#22Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#23Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#24Want to run another webserver instance or whatever on your computer? Get the OS to allocate a new IP for it. Ports be damned.
Could be implemented in a backwards compatible way by requiring all IPv6 TCP/UDP traffic to use a fixed port number.
Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#25Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#26Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#27Why not resolve everything with UNIX sockets instead, that way you can have them named and scoped instead, hiding behind port 443, since it's mosly HTTP anyway.
Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#28Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#29Not too long ago I had a similar issue and solved with that.
Re: I Got Sick of Remembering Port Numbers
#30It's like someone should make a file... maybe in /etc ... and put short names for services in it... maybe it could be called /etc/services...
And then they might code up some sort of service lookup tool thingy to use on the train wreck that is the modern web. $ getent services gopher gopher 70/tcp
also `curl -v http://127.0.0.1:gopher/` gives error message
* URL rejected: Port number was not a decimal number between 0 and 65535
* Closing connection
curl: (3) URL rejected: Port number was not a decimal number between 0 and 65535
so the ports are named, it is nice, but in practice it does not make life easier.