...however I don't think that the source was ever published anywhere, considering that the repository still doesn't have the source code yet. ("Please check out the YootTower repo, where I'll publish the source code once it's cleaned up, reviewed and approved by Yoot, and relicensed with the MIT licensed.")
Reverse Engineering SimTower
21–30 of 82 posts
Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#22> I didn’t want to do a function-by-function port. First, APIs may be copyrightable - and copying a binary that closely might implicate copyright more than an approach closer to clean-room design. But it was clear that I needed some level of feedback from the ground-truth binary in order to provide a hill for the LLM to climb on the reimplementation.
Interesting, but isn't this what, say, the Ocarina of Time reverse engineer port does[1]? I imagine the fact that this hasn't been served a takedown notice from Nintendo is a proof that it's defensible? Or at least that there's precedent, ha.
Anyway, this is really cool. I genuinely think the only thing that's missing for me to waste an afternoon here is the sound effects!
Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#23I’ll have to check this out!
Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#24Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#25Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#26Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#27Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#28I'm gonna Google that and see what I got wrong
Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#29that doesnt sound too terrible to be honest. TIL that 8am-2pm is 2x usage.
Re: Reverse Engineering SimTower
#30This perfectly describes what feels off to me about Opus 4.7 (unsure if that’s what you are using). It seems to go down an incorrect path, I correct it, but it still references things from it. Trying to direct it back becomes a mess.
Has anyone experience this as well or am I going crazy? Doesn’t happen with 4.6 for me.