Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I meant that the amount of detail is sustained no matter how close you look? Maybe I was careless with my words? This is unnecessarily pedantic. I enjoyed the article. See you another time, CyberDildonics
Don't worry, I completely agree with your original comment and think CyberDildonics is being a bit of a dildo in this case...
I ask reasonable questions and because of that you insult me?