Live data from Hacker News

A Renaissance gambling dispute spawned probability theory

scientificamerican.com

21–24 of 24 posts

Re: A Renaissance gambling dispute spawned probability theory

#21
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, and Cauchy is the person we have to thank for Bayes’ Theorem, and of course Euler, De Moivre, Poisson and Gauss for the Gaussian integral[1]. You can’t really get figures more central to mathematics than that. [1] Athough Gauss apparently credited it to Laplace.

Most of the names you mention belong to the next (18th) century. Gauss worked out some sort of probability distribution too.

[deleted]

Re: A Renaissance gambling dispute spawned probability theory

#22

The article links to a series of letters between Fermat, Pascal, and Carcavi which are wonderfully intelligent and readable, while also deeply kind and personal. > 1. I have been delighted to have had the thoughts conformed to those of M. Pascal, for I admire infinitely his genius and I believe him very capable of coming to the end of all that which he will undertake. The friendship that he offers me is so dear to me…

Perhaps future generations will reference certain threads here on HN.

We're already referencing the Dropbox antagonist whenever we can.

Re: A Renaissance gambling dispute spawned probability theory

#23

The article links to a series of letters between Fermat, Pascal, and Carcavi which are wonderfully intelligent and readable, while also deeply kind and personal. > 1. I have been delighted to have had the thoughts conformed to those of M. Pascal, for I admire infinitely his genius and I believe him very capable of coming to the end of all that which he will undertake. The friendship that he offers me is so dear to me…

> I have not time to send you the demonstration of a difficulty which greatly astonished M. de Mere, for he has a very good mind, but he is not a geometer (this is, as you know, a great defect) and he does not even understand that a mathematical line is divisible to infinity and believes very well to understand that it is composed of points in finite number, and never have I been able to pull him from it. If you could do that, one would render him perfect.

Re: A Renaissance gambling dispute spawned probability theory

#24
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Perhaps future generations will reference certain threads here on HN.

This does happen some on other websites. I've often seen people in math discuss things that Bill Thurston (a fields medalist) has posted on mathoverflow https://mathoverflow.net/users/9062/bill-thurston note that he has been deceased for nearly 15 years now.

Math is particularly nice in that whole papers can be discussed/compressed into a single conversation, unlike, a scientific experiment which requires many figures and controls to confirm or deny one's hypothesis. It's why teatime culture is so great in academic math departments worldwide. I'd listen in at my undergrad institution and usually a single conversation between two professors at teatime could be written up into a paper if they really wanted to. During undergrad I was mentored by one of Bill's students, and he'd often comment that Bill's glib throwaways would usually be very profound if you thought through it carefully.
Post reply on HN