According to the draft Wikipedia article for this company that hasn't been published because it is not yet considered sufficiently noteworthy, this company has existed for 17 years, built their first production facility in 2023, and first delivered working units into real cars last March. That doesn't strike me as moving all that fast. It also says they acquired the Bose product they're shitting on in this article fo…
Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
21–30 of 31 posts
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#22Can someone in plain English please tell us what this company does? I just see one anecdote after another that’s scattered with feel-good whodathunkit babble. I was anticipating the airplane holes analogy, but maybe I got lucky and missed it.
"ClearMotion, a company developing automotive robotics that stabilize vehicle ride and handling"
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#23Fun read but a bit too much fluff? I was a design MechE for about a decade and I’m by no means as successful as the OP. But I have worked on a 5 person design team that had an annual net revenue of 30M and another job where I worked on 25M+ contract with just a team of 2, me and my mentor at the time. End of the day, hardware execution is hard and there’s a ton of product development cycle theories, you just need a c…
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#24Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#25Nice read but falls into a vast reductionist trap, a lot of survivorship bias dressed up as design philosophy or strategic bets. The context of decisions made decades ago != now, people were working under different constraints etc. Trying to frame the avionics example as the "subtractive" innovation is the most egregious, transistors were over 1000x times smaller, weight wasn't even a consideration.
> a lot of survivorship bias dressed up as design philosophy or strategic bets I wish more people realized this
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#26Just when I think I cannot see more emdashes, there are more emdashes.
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#27I think Clearmotion has a very interesting technology and product (ride stabilization), but let's paint a full picture here: the company was founded in 2009, took on $370 million in funding, and only recently landed large contracts (a $1 billion dollar deal in 2023 with Chinese auto manufacturer, Nio). I'm sure they were in a constant struggle for survival and had to "move fast" to stay afloat, but their technology i…
What is the longevity vs a passive system? How much is it to service vs standard suspension? How much does this change the overall suspension design? How much weight does it add? I bet the answers to those questions since 2009 were not at all enticing to automotive designers or bean counters.
Personally, I would not want such a system on my car. It sounds like another expensive maintenance item you have to deal with that adds little or no value.
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#28I think Clearmotion has a very interesting technology and product (ride stabilization), but let's paint a full picture here: the company was founded in 2009, took on $370 million in funding, and only recently landed large contracts (a $1 billion dollar deal in 2023 with Chinese auto manufacturer, Nio). I'm sure they were in a constant struggle for survival and had to "move fast" to stay afloat, but their technology i…
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#29Can someone in plain English please tell us what this company does? I just see one anecdote after another that’s scattered with feel-good whodathunkit babble. I was anticipating the airplane holes analogy, but maybe I got lucky and missed it.
"ClearMotion, a company developing automotive robotics that stabilize vehicle ride and handling"
Re: Moving fast in hardware: lessons from lab to $100M ARR
#30Great piece but sometimes I wonder how much is human thought vs AI fluff.