Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Just like ICE killing american citizens? Yeah, what's the problem with that?
[dead]
Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
21–30 of 185 posts
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Just like ICE killing american citizens? Yeah, what's the problem with that?
Of course these 2 compare about as standing on a random pedestrian's toe compares to massacring a small city. Both regrettable in absolute terms, but not remotely comparable.
(why not just the numbers? Because the ICE deaths were definitely not intentional. Nobody gave anybody the order to fire. But Iran's killing of protestors was 100% intentional by the regime. In other words, aside from 2 versus 40.000, all 40.000 Iranian deaths count as 1st degree murder, including the massacre on children Iran's islamists committed)
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#23I wonder what's stranger. That they think Trump will care about OpenAI's datacenter in Abu Dhabi, or that we're getting this news from tomshardware.com
He may care in the end, because TACO. Looks like this is a pattern of modern war where both sides are testing the escalation levels by attacking the infrastructure. It‘s like MAD, but going up in smaller increments rather than hitting with everything after one or two limited strikes like nuclear. Basically, you hit my power plant, I‘ll hit yours. It‘s the same path Ukraine went on: they initially showed restraint in…
He won't care unless someone bribes him to care. This is all happening someplace not at one of his golf courses.
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
He may care in the end, because TACO. Looks like this is a pattern of modern war where both sides are testing the escalation levels by attacking the infrastructure. It‘s like MAD, but going up in smaller increments rather than hitting with everything after one or two limited strikes like nuclear. Basically, you hit my power plant, I‘ll hit yours. It‘s the same path Ukraine went on: they initially showed restraint in…
He won't care unless someone bribes him to care. This is all happening someplace not at one of his golf courses.
Well, there you have it - the principal investors in $30 billion dollar capital infrastructure projects have been known to bribe a POTUS or two.
At the very least dangle a shiny gold ball tickling trophy in his eyeline to briefly gain attention.
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like ICE killing american citizens? Yeah, what's the problem with that?
Of course these 2 compare about as standing on a random pedestrian's toe compares to massacring a small city. Both regrettable in absolute terms, but not remotely comparable. (why not just the numbers? Because the ICE deaths were definitely not intentional. Nobody gave anybody the order to fire. But Iran's killing of protestors was 100% intentional by the regime. In other words, aside from 2 versus 40.000, all 40.000…
As an American citizen my concern is the American regime shooting American citizens.
I'm not Iranian and I'm not there, but I'm here where ICE can "unintentionally" shot me.
And bringing numbers to make them look bad and justify the war doesn't help, because Israel killed much more in Gaza with the help of US government and corporations.
Let's compare both them?
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Irans leadership does not want to be killed by being bombed every few month. So they need to impose sufficient costs to deter bombing them. Idk what you are missing... maybe that people don't want to be killed and try to implement strategies to not get killed?
[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Irans leadership does not want to be killed by being bombed every few month. So they need to impose sufficient costs to deter bombing them. Idk what you are missing... maybe that people don't want to be killed and try to implement strategies to not get killed?
[flagged]
"The United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters through the Kurds, President Trump told Fox News."
"Happy New Year to every Iranian in the streets. Also to every Mossad agent walking beside them..." - Mike Pompeo
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
"The United States sent guns to the Iranian protesters through the Kurds, President Trump told Fox News." "Happy New Year to every Iranian in the streets. Also to every Mossad agent walking beside them..." - Mike Pompeo
Words from one of the world's most infamous delusional liars. Words worth nothing.
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#29It started as "Weapons of Mass Distraction" from Epstein.
Completely overplayed. Epstein (and fiends) will be the cause of more mass slaughter, starting with a school full of little girls. Of course, little girls.
The world is being run by a gang of narcissistic, sociopathic fiends thanks to all the idiots who fell for their racist, misogynist, nationalist, religious fanaticism.
Buddhist leader Daisaku Ikeda:
To end the human institution of war, to relegate it to history with such barbarous practices as slavery―at one time also considered a natural, inevitable, “part of human nature”―we must establish respect for the inviolable dignity of human life as the core value of our age.
Every war, when viewed from the undistorted perspective of life’s sanctity, is a “civil war” waged by humanity against itself.
Re: Iran threatens 'complete and utter annihilation' of OpenAI's $30B Stargate
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just like ICE killing american citizens? Yeah, what's the problem with that?
Of course these 2 compare about as standing on a random pedestrian's toe compares to massacring a small city. Both regrettable in absolute terms, but not remotely comparable. (why not just the numbers? Because the ICE deaths were definitely not intentional. Nobody gave anybody the order to fire. But Iran's killing of protestors was 100% intentional by the regime. In other words, aside from 2 versus 40.000, all 40.000…
By what measure were the ICE killings not intentional? Lifting a dude you just shot to point out the holes in him to your friends not intentional enough for ya?