A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
21–30 of 38 posts
Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#22Interesting that OP's only other submission is identical, with a post assuring us "this is a truth". Dulat, is that you?
Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#23Interesting that OP's only other submission is identical, with a post assuring us "this is a truth". Dulat, is that you?
Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#24Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#25Looks like this guy tried to brandish a firearm while attempting to meet with the plaintiff, a restraining order seems very reasonable given the circumstances.
The location in question has full camera surveillance, which clearly shows what actually happened. There was no firearm involved.
Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#26The only useful bit I can get from that incredibly ugly/spammy site is that the restraining order referenced "workplace violence"
Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#27Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#28Re: A16Z Capital Management, Llc Vs. [name redacted]
#29To access the actual docs, go here: https://web.sanmateocourt.org/midx/ Search for 26-CIV-00518 Deep link to the petition/complaint PDF: https://tinyurl.com/32xj5djy (The details are the last page) The respondent did not show up to the hearing. They also did not show up to the gun relinquishment hearing, where it was noted they have approached another VC firm with a firearm before being apprehended by the police. The…
The claim that he approached another VC firm is incorrect. He was invited to the location via text message, where the founder encouraged him to apply and be accepted into their accelerator program. Upon arrival, the situation became uncomfortable, with individuals attempting to intimidate and surround him. There is a growing concern among founders about how ideas are handled in these environments, and situations like…
I don't know what happened but the last paragraph of the complaint says he approached another firm, became aggressive, and pulled out a firearm.
There isn't a transcript of the hearing itself or other affidavits that give a different pov like you are giving.
He also did not show up to the hearing or send a lawyer to present an alternative view or set of evidence.
At that point it becomes an accepted set of uncontested facts (legally, i mean)